Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] cve-check: fix comments

["Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com>]

Hi Michael

Please send these patches to openembedded-core mailing list since these 
are for core layer.

On 8/5/21 3:27 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This implements various fixes in comments in cve-check.bbclass
> In particular, the "whitlisted" typo is important as the "whitelisted"
> word is going to be replaced in a near future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
> ---
>   meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
> index a3fc9c2623..acdf005a72 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>   # the only method to check against CVEs. Running this tool
>   # doesn't guarantee your packages are free of CVEs.
>   
> -# The product name that the CVE database uses.  Defaults to BPN, but may need to
> +# The product name that the CVE database uses defaults to BPN, but may need to
>   # be overriden per recipe (for example tiff.bb sets CVE_PRODUCT=libtiff).
>   CVE_PRODUCT ??= "${BPN}"
>   CVE_VERSION ??= "${PV}"
> @@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST ?= ""
>   # Layers to be excluded
>   CVE_CHECK_LAYER_EXCLUDELIST ??= ""
>   
> -# Layers to be included
> +# Layers to be included
>   CVE_CHECK_LAYER_INCLUDELIST ??= ""
>   
>   
> -# set to "alphabetical" for version using single alphabetical character as increament release
> +# set to "alphabetical" for version using single alphabetical character as increment release
>   CVE_VERSION_SUFFIX ??= ""
>   
>   python cve_save_summary_handler () {
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
>           return ([], [], [])
>       pv = d.getVar("CVE_VERSION").split("+git")[0]
>   
> -    # If the recipe has been whitlisted we return empty lists
> +    # If the recipe has been whitelisted we return empty lists
>       if pn in d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_PN_WHITELIST").split():
>           bb.note("Recipe has been whitelisted, skipping check")
>           return ([], [], [])
> 
> 
> 
> 
>