From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: anshuman.gupta@intel.com, umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@intel.com, michal.wajdeczko@intel.com,
satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add engine activity test for all functions
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:50:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5717516-fdc9-4006-b5f2-e2392787813b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321110958.3557106-3-riana.tauro@intel.com>
On 3/21/2025 12:09 PM, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Provision and enable 2 VFs with execution quantum and scheduling policy
> set. Add a test that runs workload on all functions simultaneously and
> validates that all engines are equally and fully loaded for the
> entire execution quantum of the function
>
> v2: add a different function for function config
> add function details to log
> move pmu_fd to struct
> enable and provision VF's (Umesh)
>
> v3: split patches
> move exec_quantum to variables
> skip test if vfs are already provisioned
> fix assert (Umesh)
>
> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_pmu.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
> index f0959abe2..9a1f9b39e 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
> @@ -14,11 +14,13 @@
>
> #include "igt.h"
> #include "igt_perf.h"
> +#include "igt_sriov_device.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
>
> #include "xe/xe_gt.h"
> #include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
> #include "xe/xe_spin.h"
> +#include "xe/xe_sriov_provisioning.h"
>
> #define SLEEP_DURATION 2 /* in seconds */
> /* flag masks */
> @@ -124,6 +126,12 @@ static uint64_t get_event_config(unsigned int gt, struct drm_xe_engine_class_ins
> return pmu_config;
> }
>
> +static uint64_t get_event_config_fn(unsigned int gt, int function,
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, const char *event)
> +{
> + return get_event_config(gt, eci, event) | add_format_config("function", function);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * SUBTEST: engine-activity-idle
> * Description: Test to validate engine activity shows no load when idle
> @@ -187,6 +195,73 @@ static void engine_activity(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, un
> igt_assert(!engine_active_ticks);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: all-fn-engine-activity-load
> + * Description: Test to validate engine activity by running load on all functions simultaneously
> + */
> +static void engine_activity_all_fn(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, int num_fns)
> +{
> + uint64_t config, engine_active_ticks, engine_total_ticks;
> + uint64_t after[2 * num_fns], before[2 * num_fns];
> + struct pmu_function {
> + struct xe_cork *cork;
> + uint32_t vm;
> + uint64_t pmu_fd[2];
> + int fd;
> + } fn[num_fns];
> + int i;
> +
> + fn[0].pmu_fd[0] = -1;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_fns; i++) {
> + config = get_event_config_fn(eci->gt_id, i, eci, "engine-active-ticks");
> + fn[i].pmu_fd[0] = open_group(fd, config, fn[0].pmu_fd[0]);
> +
> + config = get_event_config_fn(eci->gt_id, i, eci, "engine-total-ticks");
> + fn[i].pmu_fd[1] = open_group(fd, config, fn[0].pmu_fd[0]);
> +
> + if (i > 0)
> + fn[i].fd = igt_sriov_open_vf_drm_device(fd, i);
> + else
> + fn[i].fd = fd;
> +
> + igt_assert_fd(fn[i].fd);
> +
> + fn[i].vm = xe_vm_create(fn[i].fd, 0, 0);
> + fn[i].cork = xe_cork_create_opts(fn[i].fd, eci, fn[i].vm, 1, 1);
> + xe_cork_sync_start(fn[i].fd, fn[i].cork);
> + }
> +
> + pmu_read_multi(fn[0].pmu_fd[0], 2 * num_fns, before);
> + usleep(SLEEP_DURATION * USEC_PER_SEC);
> + pmu_read_multi(fn[0].pmu_fd[0], 2 * num_fns, after);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_fns; i++) {
> + int idx = i * 2;
> +
> + xe_cork_sync_end(fn[i].fd, fn[i].cork);
> + engine_active_ticks = after[idx] - before[idx];
> + engine_total_ticks = after[idx + 1] - before[idx + 1];
> +
> + igt_debug("[%d] Engine active ticks: after %ld, before %ld delta %ld\n", i,
> + after[idx], before[idx], engine_active_ticks);
> + igt_debug("[%d] Engine total ticks: after %ld, before %ld delta %ld\n", i,
> + after[idx + 1], before[idx + 1], engine_total_ticks);
> +
> + if (fn[i].cork)
> + xe_cork_destroy(fn[i].fd, fn[i].cork);
> +
> + xe_vm_destroy(fn[i].fd, fn[i].vm);
> +
> + close(fn[i].pmu_fd[0]);
> + close(fn[i].pmu_fd[1]);
> +
> + if (i > 0)
> + close(fn[i].fd);
> +
> + assert_within_epsilon(engine_active_ticks, engine_total_ticks, tolerance);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * SUBTEST: gt-c6-idle
> * Description: Basic residency test to validate idle residency
> @@ -225,6 +300,33 @@ static void test_gt_c6_idle(int xe, unsigned int gt)
> close(pmu_fd);
> }
>
> +static unsigned int enable_and_provision_vfs(int fd)
> +{
> + unsigned int gt, num_vfs;
> + int pf_exec_quantum = 64, vf_exec_quantum = 32, vf;
Are those arbirtrary exec_quantum values ?
> +
> + /* Enable VF's */
> + igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
> + igt_sriov_enable_vfs(fd, 2);
Perhaps we want to skip if sriov_totalvfs < 2 ?
> + num_vfs = igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd);
> + igt_require(num_vfs == 2);
> +
> + /* Set 32ms for VF execution quantum and 64ms for PF execution quantum */
> + xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
> + xe_sriov_set_sched_if_idle(fd, gt, 0);
> + for (int fn = 0; fn <= num_vfs; fn++)
> + xe_sriov_set_exec_quantum_ms(fd, fn, gt, fn ? vf_exec_quantum :
> + pf_exec_quantum);
> + }
> +
> + /* probe VFs */
> + igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
> + for (vf = 1; vf <= num_vfs; vf++)
> + igt_sriov_bind_vf_drm_driver(fd, vf);
> +
> + return num_vfs;
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> int fd, gt;
> @@ -254,6 +356,33 @@ igt_main
> test_each_engine("engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
> engine_activity(fd, eci, TEST_LOAD);
>
> + igt_subtest_group {
> + bool autoprobe;
> + unsigned int num_fns;
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + igt_require(igt_sriov_is_pf(fd));
> + igt_require(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd) == 0);
> + autoprobe = igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(fd);
> + num_fns = enable_and_provision_vfs(fd) + 1;
The drawback of enabling VFs inside this fixture is that it executes for
each subtest outside the subtest group (e.g., engine-activity-load
above). It might be worth creating a dedicated test with sriov in its
name and considering not limiting it to just two VFs.
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Validate engine activity on all functions");
> + test_each_engine("all-fn-engine-activity-load", fd, eci)
> + engine_activity_all_fn(fd, eci, num_fns);
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + igt_sriov_disable_vfs(fd);
> + /* abort to avoid execution of next tests with enabled VFs */
> + igt_abort_on_f(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd) > 0,
> + "Failed to disable VF(s)");
> + autoprobe ? igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(fd) :
> + igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(fd);
> + igt_abort_on_f(autoprobe != igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(fd),
> + "Failed to restore sriov_drivers_autoprobe value\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture {
> close(fd);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 11:09 [PATCH i-g-t v3 0/3] Add engine activity tests for functions Riana Tauro
2025-03-21 11:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: move xe perf device to fixture Riana Tauro
2025-03-21 19:30 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-24 5:30 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-03-21 11:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add engine activity test for all functions Riana Tauro
2025-03-21 20:45 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-24 5:24 ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-24 17:25 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-24 5:43 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-03-26 10:50 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2025-03-27 10:04 ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-21 11:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/3] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Add a test to validate engine activity on a function Riana Tauro
2025-03-21 20:50 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-24 17:27 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-03-21 18:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add engine activity tests for functions (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-21 19:12 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-21 20:54 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-21 23:13 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5717516-fdc9-4006-b5f2-e2392787813b@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.