From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:07:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205]:31897 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133429AbWAKLGz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:06:55 +0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so126698wri for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:10:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gjDTX9iblrfg7cC2ZZ1IEQHMmRVGUFGGkjCjBvxpaV3356sImMbFhh2wMPbK2aLHgUqgmheTBMC6o6JoRQiPcrTzj922qst+wSU0lNVy8jZtA9gfUqfiyiRsa2FMfgpcEOHNgsI1224WartvbwVcMF0mCdyav2RzaOZ05DJ4Q80= Received: by 10.54.72.5 with SMTP id u5mr798317wra; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.69.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:10:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:10:05 +0100 From: Ivan Korzakow To: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: why the early_initcall(au1x00_setup) do not work? Cc: "P. Christeas" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org In-Reply-To: <20060110215322.GA27577@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <50c9a2250601082159p238cacd6r930709da9305479e@mail.gmail.com> <200601101757.45297.p_christ@hol.gr> <200601101857.26978.p_christ@hol.gr> <20060110215322.GA27577@linux-mips.org> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9852 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ivan.korzakow@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips 2006/1/10, Ralf Baechle : > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:57:24PM +0200, P. Christeas wrote: > > > > > You make sure you have the two trees and diff them. > > > > They 're both in git and typically you could do that only using git. > > > > > > Have you ever tried what you're talking about or is it a guess ? > > > For example, let's say that there's a bug introduced when merging > > > Linus tree with mips branch. How do you easily "bisect" in order to do > > > a binary seek of this bug ? > > > > I was about to mention the git incompatibility as I gave you the first > > answer. It's true what you say and I also find it annoying. That's why I use > > Linus tree. > > I cannot, though, complaint to Ralph about this practice. It seems that he has > > done his best to preserve the CVS history of his tree. We can only thank him > > for that. It is just a lot of work to trim the tree and make it > > Linus-parallel. > > There is also things that I don't know about git, so I won't jump to > > conclusions yet (as to whether it is feasible to merge with Linus). > > It is possible to keep both Linus's and the lmo tree in the same > repository with a _little_ care. I do that all the time. When compressed > this will result in a bloat of just about 10-20MB. > It would be great to be a little bit more explicit by giving some _little_ examples ! Why not enlighting us directly instead of being so vague. Thanks Ivan