From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:15:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]:21823 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133464AbWAKPOp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:14:45 +0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so177354wri for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:17:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JSPyKQQ6uPE8V5EuPZZfVm84EIASVdoPVRtzt+UIKDEH+zo/hHU3GVQ/y5qvkeYK8/BCXw4s7kWtgZFBTe1UvWPprDU4wa6rRLVWm89VyzPpzCM5Lpj0583W7uUcpB/rw0vj0RwGvKCKrdnRR4NJL+X3tnOvmiUAMjgX93fCB30= Received: by 10.54.120.12 with SMTP id s12mr907192wrc; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.69.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:17:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:17:55 +0100 From: Ivan Korzakow To: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: why the early_initcall(au1x00_setup) do not work? Cc: "P. Christeas" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org In-Reply-To: <20060110232006.GA3519@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <50c9a2250601082159p238cacd6r930709da9305479e@mail.gmail.com> <200601101757.45297.p_christ@hol.gr> <200601101857.26978.p_christ@hol.gr> <20060110232006.GA3519@linux-mips.org> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9860 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ivan.korzakow@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips 2006/1/11, Ralf Baechle : > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0100, Ivan Korzakow wrote: > > > Why not simply keep CVS repository available for 1% of people willing > > to browse the history ? And make life easier for 99% of people willing > > to work on 2.6 ... (2.4 work may continue to use CVS too). > > The CVS repository is still available - and will stay for a long time so > people have a chance to do diffs against their existing checked out trees. > But no more changes. > again why not letting 2.2 2.4 stay in CVS ? I don't think there are any active development, isn't it ? Ivan