From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test to ensure kprobe_multi is not sleepable
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 12:13:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6ed5221-876c-499e-aacf-a9f6cac438f1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401191126.440683-2-varunrmallya@gmail.com>
Above all, I think the test should reproduce the BUG without the fix.
I update the test to reproduce the BUG, then verify that the BUG will be
rejected with the fix.
The updated test is attached at last.
On 2/4/26 03:11, Varun R Mallya wrote:
> Add a selftest to ensure that kprobe_multi programs cannot be attached
> using the BPF_F_SLEEPABLE flag. This test succeeds when the kernel
> rejects attachment of kprobe_multi when the BPF_F_SLEEPABLE flag is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c | 13 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> index 78c974d4ea33..f02fec2b6fda 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include "kprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
> #include "kprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
> #include "kprobe_write_ctx.skel.h"
> +#include "kprobe_multi_sleepable.skel.h"
> #include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
> #include "bpf/hashmap.h"
>
> @@ -633,6 +634,44 @@ static void test_attach_write_ctx(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void test_attach_multi_sleepable(void)
> +{
> + struct kprobe_multi_sleepable *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = kprobe_multi_sleepable__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__open"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = bpf_program__set_flags(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
> + BPF_F_SLEEPABLE);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_flags"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* Load should succeed even with BPF_F_SLEEPABLE for KPROBE types */
> + err = kprobe_multi_sleepable__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__load"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* Attachment must fail for kprobe.multi + BPF_F_SLEEPABLE.
> + * Also chosen a stable symbol to send into opts
> + */
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
> + const char *sym = "vfs_read";
They should stay with skel and err. See below.
> +
> + opts.syms = &sym;
> + opts.cnt = 1;
> +
> + skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable =
> + bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
> + NULL, &opts);
> + ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
> + "bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts");
As Kumar suggested, better to also verify the error here.
ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable),
-EINVAL,
"bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts error");
> +
> +cleanup:
> + kprobe_multi_sleepable__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
[...]
Thanks,
Leon
---
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 78c974d4ea33..d59cf840da83 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "kprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
#include "kprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
#include "kprobe_write_ctx.skel.h"
+#include "kprobe_multi_sleepable.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "bpf/hashmap.h"
@@ -633,6 +634,52 @@ static void test_attach_write_ctx(void)
}
#endif
+static void test_attach_multi_sleepable(void)
+{
+ struct kprobe_multi_sleepable *skel;
+ const char *sym = "bpf_fentry_test1";
+ int err;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts,
+ .syms = &sym,
+ .cnt = 1
+ );
+
+ skel = kprobe_multi_sleepable__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__open"))
+ return;
+
+ skel->bss->user_ptr = skel;
+
+ err =
bpf_program__set_flags(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
+ BPF_F_SLEEPABLE);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_flags"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* Load should succeed even with BPF_F_SLEEPABLE for KPROBE types */
+ err = kprobe_multi_sleepable__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /*
+ * Attachment must fail for kprobe.multi + BPF_F_SLEEPABLE.
+ * Also chosen a stable symbol to send into opts
+ */
+ skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable =
+
bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
+ NULL, &opts);
+ ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
+ "bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts");
+
ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable),
-EINVAL,
+ "attach_multi_sleepable_err");
+
+ err =
bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fentry), &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+
+cleanup:
+ kprobe_multi_sleepable__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("kernel"))
@@ -676,5 +723,7 @@ void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
test_unique_match();
if (test__start_subtest("attach_write_ctx"))
test_attach_write_ctx();
+ if (test__start_subtest("attach_multi_sleepable"))
+ test_attach_multi_sleepable();
RUN_TESTS(kprobe_multi_verifier);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..932e1d9c72e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+void *user_ptr = 0;
+
+SEC("kprobe.multi")
+int handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ int a, err;
+
+ err = bpf_copy_from_user(&a, sizeof(a), user_ptr);
+ barrier_var(a);
+ return err;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(fentry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 19:11 [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test to ensure kprobe_multi is not sleepable Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 22:50 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-02 9:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-06 20:11 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-02 4:13 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-04-01 22:45 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-02 4:13 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-02 9:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-02 16:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6ed5221-876c-499e-aacf-a9f6cac438f1@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=varunrmallya@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.