All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com,
	mgross@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 3/6] platform/x86/intel: Move intel_pmt from MFD to Auxiliary Bus
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 11:09:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a70956e1c4da10603e29087e893cbae62ce82631.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbD1NsYHbU8FvtTN@kroah.com>

On Wed, 2021-12-08 at 19:11 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:47:26AM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-12-08 at 17:22 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:50:12PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > > > +static struct pci_driver intel_vsec_pci_driver = {
> > > > +       .name = "intel_vsec",
> > > > +       .id_table = intel_vsec_pci_ids,
> > > > +       .probe = intel_vsec_pci_probe,
> > > > +};
> > > 
> > > So when the PCI device is removed from the system you leak resources and
> > > have dangling devices?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Why no PCI remove driver callback?
> > 
> > After probe all resources are device managed. There's nothing to explicitly clean up. When the
> > PCI
> > device is removed, all aux devices are automatically removed. This is the case for the SDSi
> > driver
> > as well.
> 
> Where is the "automatic cleanup" happening?  As this pci driver is bound
> to the PCI device, when the device is removed, what is called in this
> driver to remove the resources allocated in the probe callback?
> 
> confused,

devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, intel_vsec_remove_aux, auxdev)

intel_vsec_remove_aux() gets called when the PCI device is removed. It calls auxiliary_device_unit()
which in turn calls the auxdev release() function that cleans up resources.

When the auxdev is removed, all resources that were dev_m added by the SDSi driver are released too
which is why it has no remove() either. I'll add the tests that check this.

David

> 
> greg k-h



  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-08 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-08  1:50 [PATCH RESEND V2 0/6] Auxiliary bus driver support for Intel PCIe VSEC/DVSEC David E. Box
2021-12-08  1:50 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 1/6] PCI: Add #defines for accessing PCIe DVSEC fields David E. Box
2021-12-08  1:50 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 2/6] driver core: auxiliary bus: Add driver data helpers David E. Box
2021-12-08  1:50 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 3/6] platform/x86/intel: Move intel_pmt from MFD to Auxiliary Bus David E. Box
2021-12-08 16:22   ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 17:47     ` David E. Box
2021-12-08 18:11       ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 19:09         ` David E. Box [this message]
2021-12-08 19:21           ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 21:30             ` David E. Box
2021-12-21  7:38               ` Greg KH
2021-12-21 16:44                 ` David E. Box
2021-12-21 16:54                   ` Greg KH
2021-12-21 17:04                     ` Hans de Goede
2021-12-21 18:16                       ` David E. Box
2021-12-21 18:38                         ` Hans de Goede
2021-12-22 12:57                           ` Greg KH
2021-12-08  1:50 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 4/6] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver David E. Box
2021-12-08 16:23   ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 16:24   ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 17:49     ` David E. Box
2021-12-08 18:12       ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 18:30         ` David E. Box
2021-12-08 18:42           ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 16:29   ` Greg KH
2021-12-08 18:11     ` David E. Box
2021-12-08 16:43   ` Keith Busch
2021-12-08  1:50 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 5/6] sample/sdsi: Sample of SDSi provisiong using sysfs David E. Box
2021-12-08  1:50 ` [PATCH RESEND V2 6/6] selftests: sdsi: test sysfs setup David E. Box

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a70956e1c4da10603e29087e893cbae62ce82631.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.