From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828E8CD4F26 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com (mail-wm1-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.71208.1778575590091939315 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 01:46:30 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=Z0VITOhh; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.128.52, mailfrom: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48984d29fe3so55510345e9.0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 01:46:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1778575588; x=1779180388; darn=lists.openembedded.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=v1Q+IlSTZiKKF3dsuykyzKztkObll536xessfEgwoJk=; b=Z0VITOhh8IyfGXyLtQ9R9+HobKspDXXJOjXtURjGg94Yb9Z4gBK9miFlvLAOCupmp8 gozeyX/fymEUtFCyXPVACQIVvv7n8AIoS/C/JjLvKDSYSr4zt513bY5biu2FLH73MG9C whhp8qIPR2bbIHBYIWogkw9aVZ3rh7QFnh3AE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778575588; x=1779180388; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=v1Q+IlSTZiKKF3dsuykyzKztkObll536xessfEgwoJk=; b=JAr98zMHGVybCRknn29Q7kc9EBQDMERfBvHqi+/0LNdR/XjTKMnkZ+Onuv7S9LkGew MJDw5nDU/4th3l7jh6BzPqDzN+2WxthF5FlevZAJUXF966bD6LuKRRmlwJo7hfpKtjyp KYpr2HgVbwqJjYAfH/AoL/Pd/YI9FfBeGifTGKgU9Jzbsy/snRTAJ+6TONk7dU3Tel79 VXBusZhdWXN2Jl9PZKtw+gEO+Aj6duZuwo1QZszb6fBlNkx0CE0R4HYKTUdjcXiyhNML R0H0mzRhK672w7DDaSzRLIYwh+MPjNixIvsZUxWxshgRPzYFVXfqBTZhkf75wGPFC4t0 /BLA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9WkEckrFfQmXF1SftVFTFURaTHHiz6SaA9pZE0Q+t3J4PQ+UjEs44PLwqfHSIjXpcckYJrkQ8hbOBieQ/CobCdwA==@lists.openembedded.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzS6FWzLvTMFPjzg3Y/QEGxQmSg54POY0PsPvGPgvOfYK8lKGvh xEWLbwikmnWcMdIN3fLF3oO5TkT9in8Aq7wY6PGu+LOUswSZ0U+TPAOWWKc1YzEIqRc= X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OF/pvPvAAsmqPvmKAMlQPwfC3hJrDGmbDFzDCW7nwSaNTWYemPDDBHPUsS0RlP fePACGy9dCoxTL/gQl8VsRAQGebsfpAxtjkGC8qxqiCHZvpPhpsv7sdWxB34Z2ZCV3giP2bI1k9 agnE71DmhUxH44N35HNm+k384Lv7kXsN2Pnf+zRFPWR1Rizxa3Y1HmTjl9xjTtJa9L9SlXWZsMR gXOpj31vYP0CB2ldbwNib5xKYFne8qAKwpKLS2lBskrU6KVvSe8HRKfjA/X0jsqqYNrPij6daXT 2IHDQEVWoPlQJdj9SQM9mR43PQsXDgIw5++e5AfYcd//LCFr4+yLph8Y52Xr/QwvoJqHYXxbmMr dyQ/yp+AzrTpch5MgWYOmTkCnlwPpAei5tsE/XrUwUBXYXzpg9XZgE27KeOad5igu/ApWb/xGD9 qzqbi602pCfc24xZsLUF8ysaxQjsFmrfoRCuMMoXAmF7Y/6RsSXSGxM5KUznyjuRKFuHr4zrePM pa3KgOoR4q47XEq X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:350a:b0:488:d6eb:e63c with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48e8fe732b6mr29208515e9.15.1778575588180; Tue, 12 May 2026 01:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:44a5:ca0b:d27c:9664? ([2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:44a5:ca0b:d27c:9664]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-48ec8184114sm1080305e9.36.2026.05.12.01.46.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 May 2026 01:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] ovmf: drop gcc-12 specific BUILD_CFLAGS setting From: Richard Purdie To: joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 09:46:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2558d49d-58e6-4e0b-be28-3d27cf521dc1@bootlin.com> References: <20260511092935.2631121-1-joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com> <20260511092935.2631121-3-joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com> <5f42f257-59fa-4085-a42c-7cbe55472567@cherry.de> <708f2321-2420-431e-8b9a-3a5a470228dd@bootlin.com> <2558d49d-58e6-4e0b-be28-3d27cf521dc1@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2-9 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 08:46:33 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/236861 On Mon, 2026-05-11 at 16:00 +0200, Joao Marcos Costa via lists.openembedded= .org wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On 5/11/26 15:52, Quentin Schulz via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > (...) > >=20 > > Not necessarily true as I don't think we build GCC for native recipes= =20 > > (and ovmf has a native variant), so it depends on the GCC on the host= =20 > > (unless you have uninative?). I don't know the autobuilder=20 > > infrastructure, e.g. whether we build patches on multiple workers on= =20 > > different distros to have a big GCC version test matrix. > >=20 > > But yes, building with a newer GCC will generally not make warnings fro= m=20 > > previous versions disappear and I'm hoping upstream has had time to fix= =20 > > warnings returned by GCC12 in the last 4 years :) > >=20 > > Cheers, > > Quentin >=20 > Yep, my whole point is based on the the distros in SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS= =20 > being recent enough to ship GCC > 12 :) >=20 > I should have made it explicit in my commit message. I hate to say this but: Alma/Centos/Rocky 8 have gcc 8 Debian 11 has gcc 10 and we don't use buildtools on debian 11. I'm therefore not sure how you concluded that from SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS. Cheers, Richard