From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Tomasz Lichwala <tomasz.lichwala@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Cc: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ixgbevf: fix link speed reporting for Hyper-V E610 VFs
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:19:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a83c7d3d-64e3-4b0b-ad13-007feade1f17@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723145137.644693-1-tomasz.lichwala@linux.intel.com>
On 7/23/2026 7:51 AM, Tomasz Lichwala wrote:
...
> +/**
> + * ixgbevf_hv_read_links_e610 - read link status from PCI config space
> + * @hw: pointer to hardware structure
> + * @links_reg: pointer to store read value
> + *
> + * On Hyper-V E610 VFs the VFLINKS register does not carry valid link speed.
> + * Instead, link status is exposed through emulated PCI config space at offset
> + * 0x209 in VFLINKS register format.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +static s32 ixgbevf_hv_read_links_e610(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 *links_reg)
> +{
> + struct ixgbevf_adapter *adapter = hw->back;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG)
> + u8 data[IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_SIZE; i++) {
> + int ret = pci_read_config_byte(adapter->pdev,
> + IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_OFFSET + i,
> + &data[i]);
> + if (ret)
> + return pcibios_err_to_errno(ret);
> + }
> +
> + *links_reg = get_unaligned_le32(data);
> + return 0;
> +#else
> + dev_err_once(&adapter->pdev->dev, "cannot read link status, PCI_MMCONFIG is required for Hyper-V\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +#endif
> +}
I ran Sashiko locally on this and it reported the following:
Should a failed link read here return a fatal error to check_link, or
report link down and return 0?
When built without CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG this returns -EOPNOTSUPP on every
call, and it also returns an error on any persistent
pci_read_config_byte() failure.
> /**
> * ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf - check link
> * @hw: pointer to private hardware struct
> @@ -909,6 +946,7 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
> * @autoneg_wait_to_complete: unused
> *
> * Hyper-V variant; there is no mailbox communication.
> + * For E610 VFs, link status is read from emulated PCI config space.
> */
> static s32 ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
> ixgbe_link_speed *speed,
> @@ -923,13 +961,32 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
> if (!mbx->ops.check_for_rst(hw) || !mbx->timeout)
> mac->get_link_status = true;
>
> + /* E610 VFs always read link status from emulated PCI config space
> + * because VFLINKS does not carry valid speed for these devices.
> + * Skip get_link_status caching since PCI config reads are cheap.
> + */
> + if (mac->type == ixgbe_mac_e610_vf) {
> + s32 ret = ixgbevf_hv_read_links_e610(hw, &links_reg);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + *link_up = false;
> + *speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> + return ret;
> + }
> + goto decode;
> + }
> +
Can this cause a repeating reset loop on the degraded configuration?
The non-zero return propagates up through mac.ops.check_link() into
ixgbevf_watchdog_update_link():
err = hw->mac.ops.check_link(hw, &link_speed, &link_up, false);
...
if (err && time_after(jiffies, adapter->last_reset + (10 * HZ))) {
set_bit(__IXGBEVF_RESET_REQUESTED, &adapter->state);
link_up = false;
}
A device reset cannot make CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG appear at compile time, nor
fix a persistent config-space read failure, so wouldn't every watchdog
cycle re-arm __IXGBEVF_RESET_REQUESTED roughly every 10 seconds, leaving
the interface permanently down and continuously resetting?
Before this patch the Hyper-V check_link callback always returned 0, so no
reset request was triggered. Would returning 0 with link_up=false and
speed IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN for the unsupported/degraded case avoid the
loop?
One related note: the dev_err_once() reads as a benign one-time notice,
but the underlying -EOPNOTSUPP is returned on every poll and drives the
repeating reset behavior above.
Thanks,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 14:51 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ixgbevf: fix link speed reporting for Hyper-V E610 VFs Tomasz Lichwala
2026-07-30 21:19 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
[not found] <0de48a53-695a-4ba2-b2f3-8750334fa7a7@linux.intel.com>
2026-08-04 14:53 ` Tomasz Lichwala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a83c7d3d-64e3-4b0b-ad13-007feade1f17@intel.com \
--to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.lichwala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.