From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+16bf7cd0ebeb1de93aa5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] khugepaged: fix readahead lock inversion in collapse_file()
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 00:34:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a849043e-8421-473f-a7de-8030482bd5b5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59D0C605-0343-4CA6-8529-C399AE8BBA9F@nvidia.com>
On 2026/11/14 00:27, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2026, at 8:26, Lance Yang wrote:
>
>> collapse_file() can call page_cache_sync_readahead() while still holding
>> source folios locked. If truncate holds mapping->invalidate_lock
>> exclusively and waits for one of those folios, readahead waits for
>> invalidate_lock and neither side can make progress.
>>
>> We need to release those folio locks before starting readahead. On a page
>> cache miss, roll back first, populate the collapse range, and retry once.
>> Doing readahead after rollback avoids an extra pass when all folios are
>> already present. If another miss occurs on retry, give up rather than keep
>> retrying while truncate or reclaim removes folios.
>>
>> Keep page_cache_sync_readahead() and wait for read I/O with
>> filemap_lock_folio(), releasing each folio before moving to the next. The
>> existing uptodate check during collapse still handles read errors.
>>
>> Shmem uses shmem_get_folio() for swapin and fallocated folios without
>> taking mapping->invalidate_lock, so it is unaffected.
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+16bf7cd0ebeb1de93aa5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=16bf7cd0ebeb1de93aa5
>> Fixes: 730633f0b7f9 ("mm: Protect operations adding pages to page cache with invalidate_lock")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261026152013.10511-1-lance.yang@linux.dev
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>>
>> (cherry picked from commit eadce52a9ef657d561b3e76c9b5f178bd99735f5)
>> ---
>> Backport to 6.12:
>> - 6.12 still takes invalidate_lock in collapse_file() after locking the
>> source folios. Use filemap_invalidate_trylock_shared() and roll back
>> on contention, otherwise the same deadlock is possible even after
>> moving readahead.
>>
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
> <snip>
>
>> @@ -2040,7 +2038,10 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> * in do_dentry_open() truncating the page cache. This is
>> * particularly important if there are dirty folios in transit.
>> */
>> - filemap_invalidate_lock_shared(mapping);
>> + if (!filemap_invalidate_trylock_shared(mapping)) {
>> + result = SCAN_FAIL;
>> + goto rollback;
>> + }
>> filemap_nr_thps_inc(mapping);
>> /*
>> * Paired with the fence in do_dentry_open() -> get_write_access()
>
> This additional change to address the same deadlock makes sense to me.
>
> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Much appreciated, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 1:09 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] khugepaged: fix readahead lock inversion in collapse_file()" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 13:26 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] khugepaged: fix readahead lock inversion in collapse_file() Lance Yang
2026-11-13 2:33 ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-13 16:27 ` Zi Yan
2026-11-13 16:34 ` Lance Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a849043e-8421-473f-a7de-8030482bd5b5@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+16bf7cd0ebeb1de93aa5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.