From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann Droneaud Subject: Re: rsockets addressing Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:17:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237388CC0B81@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Gandalf Corvotempesta Cc: "Hefty, Sean" , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Le 16.09.2013 17:59, Gandalf Corvotempesta a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > 2013/9/16 Hefty, Sean : >> rsockets does not implement failover. An application would need to=20 >> reestablish a connection in the case of a failure. I have not looke= d=20 >> to see what it would take to implement failover inside rsockets, and= =20 >> that's not something I would have time to implement anytime soon. >=20 > Connection restablishement is ok, but in case of port failure, ipoib > will remap the remote IP against the new port/fabric ? You have to use InfiniBand port bonding to benefit from fail-over=20 (through APM: Automatic Path Migration ?) http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Doc= umentation/networking/bonding.txt Regards. --=20 Yann Droneaud OPTEYA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html