From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:48:00 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] sunxi: Pine64 fixes In-Reply-To: <976a8674-a0cf-e2de-b448-516048490e63@arm.com> References: <1473035561-23420-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <46ffde50-c621-e827-b063-452a4d9fadf6@redhat.com> <976a8674-a0cf-e2de-b448-516048490e63@arm.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, On 07-09-16 17:18, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/09/16 16:13, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 05-09-16 02:32, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> Some patches to fix the Pine64 support: >>> The first two patches revert two patches that actually broke booting >>> Pine64 via the boot0 blob, already in 2016.07. >>> This has been discussed on IRC before, the commit messages contain >>> some details on the reasons for the revert. As the intent of those >>> original fixes was to help the (not yet upstream) SPL support, we don't >>> loose anything as the Pine64 uses the U-Boot proper only at the moment. >>> >>> Patch 3/4 removes the usage of a non-existing config symbol. >>> Patch 4/4 fixes a compiler warning when compiling sunxi's board.c >>> with a 64-bit compiler. >>> >>> Please apply for the 2016.09 release to allow booting Pine64s with >>> a recent U-Boot. >> >> I've send out a pull-req with patches 1, 3 and 4 yesterday and >> this has been merged. > > Thanks a lot! That's very helpful. > > Cheers, > Andre. > > P.S. I have the SPL support with proper sunxi DRAM init mostly working, > I am fighting with some bugs still (FIT loading related), but I am > confident that this will be ready for the upcoming merge window. Cool, so do we then still need some closed firmware bits, or is everything open then ? Regards, Hans