From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Smitha Sunder <smitha.s@samsung.com>
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@gmail.com>, fio <fio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No I/O performed by windowsaio/get_io_u: zero buflen
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:38:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a939a262-0078-37cc-d9d4-42fdea475ea3@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55c06687ad1e4023a28a48babb7823b0@samsung.com>
On 9/17/18 10:33 AM, Smitha Sunder wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:fio-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jens Axboe
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:42 PM
> To: smitha sunder <sundersmitha@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@gmail.com>; fio <fio@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: No I/O performed by windowsaio/get_io_u: zero buflen
>
> On 9/16/18 9:34 PM, smitha sunder wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 16, 2018, at 8:31 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/16/18 9:13 PM, smitha sunder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2018, at 8:02 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/16/18 5:24 PM, smitha sunder wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 at 23:14, smitha sunder <sundersmitha@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a 30TB drive and I am running into an issue with random writes.
>>>>>>>> I went through this thread :
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.spinics
>>>>>>>> .net_lists_fio_msg06294.html&d=DwIDaQ&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgRBDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&r=fLVkx46f6GJPZippnZkCtH9m_d1P5HX6rKxJgT7l7Us&m=NaPx5NYD-_SBHGUzJNi4czQueVX-2LvLGD_SEwee41c&s=6QDNQBLcbJUsiXnq84y2HKG98aEmhvabF7uK-yKTbhk&e= that seems to be fixed already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that was something different regarding different
>>>>>>> blocksizes per direction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see the same issue with random reads as well.
>>>>>>>> So not sure what is the issue here in my case; any help is greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Read Capacity results:
>>>>>>>> Protection: prot_en=1, p_type=1, p_i_exponent=0 [type 2
>>>>>>>> protection] Logical block provisioning: lbpme=1, lbprz=1 Last
>>>>>>>> logical block address=58781073407 (0xdaf9fffff), Number of
>>>>>>>> logical blocks=58781073408 Logical block length=512 bytes
>>>>>>>> Logical blocks per physical block exponent=3 [so physical block
>>>>>>>> length=4096 bytes]
>>>>>>>> Lowest aligned logical block address=0
>>>>>>>> Hence:
>>>>>>>> Device size: 30095909584896 bytes, 2.87017e+007 MiB, 30095.9 GB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> C:\Program Files (x86)\fio>fio --ioengine=windowsaio
>>>>>>>> --group_reporting
>>>>>>>> --direct=1 --size=100% --bs=4K --thread
>>>>>>>> --filename=\\.\PhysicalDrive1 --name=precond --rw=randwrite
>>>>>>>> --iodepth=1 --numjobs=1 --debug=io,random
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> io 3372 fill: io_u 0A458780:
>>>>>>>> off=0x144365e7d000,len=0x0,ddir=1,file=\\.\PhysicalDrive1
>>>>>>>> io 3372 get_io_u: zero buflen on 0A458780
>>>>>>>> io 3372 get_io_u failed
>>>>>>>> io 3372 drop page cache \\.\PhysicalDrive1
>>>>>>>> random 3372 off rand 17311067694306724737
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That offset is crazy big - I'm sure it's bigger than a petabyte
>>>>>>> so my guess is that something is overflowing. If you use
>>>>>>> --size=27g does the job go through?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don’t see this issue if I use bs=8K or I use ba=512,8K, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sitsofe |
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sucs.org_-7Es
>>>>>>> its_&d=DwIDaQ&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgR
>>>>>>> BDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&r=fLVkx46f6GJPZippnZkCtH9m_d1P5HX6rKxJgT7l7Us&m=N
>>>>>>> aPx5NYD-_SBHGUzJNi4czQueVX-2LvLGD_SEwee41c&s=ZnZsmte_bg5yC3adbwXI
>>>>>>> U4EmuEn97cA9o1YpZxDU4m0&e=
>>>>>> Hi Sitsofe,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the reply!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes; If I use --size=27G or if provide the exact size that the OS
>>>>>> displays, then the job goes through.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you running a 32-bit or 64-bit build of fio?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jens Axboe
>>>>>
>>>> 32 bit.
>>>
>>> I thought so. I see a few 32-bit issues with huge devices. One of
>>> them is this one:
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__git.kernel.dk_cgi
>>> t_fio_commit_-3Fid-3D604d3f5bd9f2b985568593c23f8292cbc7f4044c&d=DwIDa
>>> Q&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgRBDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&
>>> r=fLVkx46f6GJPZippnZkCtH9m_d1P5HX6rKxJgT7l7Us&m=NaPx5NYD-_SBHGUzJNi4c
>>> zQueVX-2LvLGD_SEwee41c&s=AJCs8E23SmJj-z7BbkuP_yxTNDg3g6BZ8FYIcV3EmAY&
>>> e=
>>>
>>> but I'm sure there are others, I'll try and reproduce and get this fixed.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jens Axboe
>>>
>> I see the same issue even with 64 bit fio build.
>
> The difference is that an unsigned long on 64-bit windows builds is still 32-bit, whereas it's 64-bit on linux. So the easiest for me is to test on 32-bit linux, which _probably_ then hits the same thing...
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
> Jens,
>
> Got the latest build from https://ci.appveyor.com/project/axboe/fio/build/1.0.891/job/awu51avmepn1kvgf/artifacts.
>
> With size=100%, bs=4K , I no longer see the issue; thanks for the fix!
Great, thanks a lot for reporting and testing!
For what it's worth, I think we got all of them now, puzzled why we haven't
run into this sooner. I guess not a lot of folks run 32-bit builds. I also
verified the random distribution of 32-bit, and it looks fine.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-15 22:14 No I/O performed by windowsaio/get_io_u: zero buflen smitha sunder
2018-09-16 22:02 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-09-16 23:24 ` smitha sunder
2018-09-17 3:02 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-17 3:13 ` smitha sunder
2018-09-17 3:31 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-17 3:34 ` smitha sunder
2018-09-17 3:41 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-17 16:33 ` Smitha Sunder
2018-09-17 16:38 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-09-17 3:45 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-17 3:50 ` smitha sunder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a939a262-0078-37cc-d9d4-42fdea475ea3@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sitsofe@gmail.com \
--cc=smitha.s@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.