From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EE8C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 19:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233409AbiGFTzd (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:55:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44512 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230285AbiGFTzb (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:55:31 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2ED017594 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id u14so19774091ljh.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1cggqdheLf5tx5a4RWqD6gQP3vfX6AayXoHRI5JqNGE=; b=mxx0NhRQGF1roPP4zUR+jS909if3vve2lCYvqaCEj0o8N8iN2WWvFZrCj72oW4VAJl 4A4EHkuGXvb/iMt+FKYOYSXXnkfZB7wk/vxowFPjLKoFPuJkBcoqSykKDWFYoC6gtITD +lMVqMSTotP+JkO8YToXGVnCZEcFtpp0R0HeHuy8ZLpnv3m/QlxJ9/CSQhJ+19e5gptB nUU6Al/QL71JK8UOiq5xICi46Qv/8rYBqAHS7HWJc3qqeGhjpu7qdMJROatRzOxrZYyr MoebsfkQ8tAE90yRHltpvsxyIYZ+TK7Gkv9Dv8Mkmf6H2nllsdO/KwBY9AYisOcj4KMW xJyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1cggqdheLf5tx5a4RWqD6gQP3vfX6AayXoHRI5JqNGE=; b=1BFRfRrKcWNNNadOM9SoLdGMa8eNoKsLlSu4ecJIntgz0xsDf0JiN1/ixIyAmGaU/j ckFDk8KsVVeK87ND0htZVebUYnx2dsk5t1Se7nSOlTxpgP00f18cRqsel7TBWFpIAjwf yvvAf0FLH5uld1bq2dX+yqk3S3u8Rue+VxrJ2SQzYHSLK8806qf3cWEwWCPT3s0/nk9g 8vMzTJPHfhpY0JwbCTm/sALrp44DQYnnuxo3PPAphNO7aqNuYA9fHXPCfS507w6ewwkh MkGefTQSHZyMNdQ52dZ/q65CRW2r7K8A+kUVaxqMz4V4hxdpGIBBpLEhaxhy0Q9xSAaV SCDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8oe+xDJ2XJynnQKJbRe+bqMb1/f8yRQTcmC5zj9TioIJ7Qjtz6 GOGesG+/Y86XTa1SHdGhsQ9LQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vnBn9IH/IF7sLcDzjlPr71ImIMk5XqA2RucdlxyWgmXqAt0KV2/I5NtaX1BUqu46ajylefPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2317:b0:25b:fc32:906a with SMTP id bi23-20020a05651c231700b0025bfc32906amr19597103ljb.445.1657137329221; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.52] ([84.20.121.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11-20020a056512234b00b0047f6b4a53cdsm6413232lfu.172.2022.07.06.12.55.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:55:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Wolfram Sang , Sebastian Reichel , Heiko Stuebner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20220623163136.246404-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> <2664d6a7-ee4b-9cfa-800e-e97522e3986c@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> That's still some old tree you are based on... > > What do you mean by that? The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :) Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB45C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 19:55:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gSin2uiIvd+tjau2xTqzapLNg0hC5boauu2/nGeo/5s=; b=BMQBmpN4vHnTx8 BkWTSkSwZPhI9Vh0cyCZH+bCAiL0ROTb6MmLi/7JWo0avZmcVnTQiPUBloT0pG2HJQdjY92uSwbJl VQL6SBnBhDPrvoG2zoIwD28vXVIxUsCPpH8p05mK/LyaHaCZU2REmBs/rcO8qDZ309/7Wzr0yukaM qV7hp9P6XRfXr55Vdnl755nsZiZdiZfjzZzrB4MUEl8/Bd476SOGE6KVUr0aZ2zJqhEqrQ5x7tN4G 4PxUUNs5r3SQk1EaaoS9FEn1/q9CN7m8C5wEKA7jk1zsAbQG3kmpB6e8CpQnVhyEQ/jhKnuPAuAjh SdohPDJugWbygBlZyyhQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o9B7V-00CG6H-Pz; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:55:33 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o9B7T-00CG5d-2s for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:55:32 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i17so14986854ljj.12 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1cggqdheLf5tx5a4RWqD6gQP3vfX6AayXoHRI5JqNGE=; b=mxx0NhRQGF1roPP4zUR+jS909if3vve2lCYvqaCEj0o8N8iN2WWvFZrCj72oW4VAJl 4A4EHkuGXvb/iMt+FKYOYSXXnkfZB7wk/vxowFPjLKoFPuJkBcoqSykKDWFYoC6gtITD +lMVqMSTotP+JkO8YToXGVnCZEcFtpp0R0HeHuy8ZLpnv3m/QlxJ9/CSQhJ+19e5gptB nUU6Al/QL71JK8UOiq5xICi46Qv/8rYBqAHS7HWJc3qqeGhjpu7qdMJROatRzOxrZYyr MoebsfkQ8tAE90yRHltpvsxyIYZ+TK7Gkv9Dv8Mkmf6H2nllsdO/KwBY9AYisOcj4KMW xJyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1cggqdheLf5tx5a4RWqD6gQP3vfX6AayXoHRI5JqNGE=; b=IEz+O5EHrOIWx/cRXJDnCY6tqCuYSiARzI7eCbPB3Z+5VEQnkb/zRZ7rD+xSaqYT7S OcqxYNjpYrNyXcmYg/z2vE3BW1jMT1xlqjoIPyiMBO9NygyGxaMzTk9p8wWP3x2uMWz6 k4Oxl/wn1pK3FQm8kbmtWrG4fgiDPzwahAavFfcgWCK2kK3yPgOIa2yP2cIE/Ur0pApN 9kQslnp24LVIzSrbK/MwV7KhOn1B+uq2Ys6YhsdV8HTBDhlD4MCZ47zJrnzIV/RphwZC ssNKe5FcsxB3cjGo3k+V4gBhY3QTBHFOueEEi5XC6ZtxTMcABE8Mwex/p54+lK9fbJSs ISbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+1O7Ry8P7HhNOxnE6LVUHhga82MUz0xKIJNXSkuYktkUGv4M3d 8JV+byek4frAThwJHYbsdoZQWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vnBn9IH/IF7sLcDzjlPr71ImIMk5XqA2RucdlxyWgmXqAt0KV2/I5NtaX1BUqu46ajylefPg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2317:b0:25b:fc32:906a with SMTP id bi23-20020a05651c231700b0025bfc32906amr19597103ljb.445.1657137329221; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.52] ([84.20.121.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11-20020a056512234b00b0047f6b4a53cdsm6413232lfu.172.2022.07.06.12.55.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:55:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Wolfram Sang , Sebastian Reichel , Heiko Stuebner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20220623163136.246404-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> <2664d6a7-ee4b-9cfa-800e-e97522e3986c@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220706_125531_189840_265D94AE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> That's still some old tree you are based on... > > What do you mean by that? The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :) Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip