From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
eblake@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] block/io: skip head/tail requests on EINVAL
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:49:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aADAs7oerG789LTI@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414201214.241351-3-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 14.04.2025 um 22:12 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> When guests send misaligned discard requests, the block layer breaks
> them up into a misaligned head, an aligned main body, and a misaligned
> tail.
>
> The file-posix block driver on Linux returns -EINVAL on misaligned
> discard requests. This causes bdrv_co_pdiscard() to fail and guests
> configured with werror=stop will pause.
>
> Add a special case for misaligned head/tail requests. Simply continue
> when EINVAL is encountered so that the aligned main body of the request
> can be completed and the guest is not paused. This is the best we can do
> when guest discard limits do not match the host discard limits.
>
> Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-86032
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
It would be good to also update the comment a bit further up:
/* Discard is advisory, but some devices track and coalesce
* unaligned requests, so we must pass everything down rather than
* round here. Still, most devices will just silently ignore
* unaligned requests (by returning -ENOTSUP), so we must fragment
* the request accordingly. */
I'm not sure where the -ENOTSUP came from (Eric, do you remember?), but
we should at least mention this -EINVAL case separately.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 20:12 [PATCH v3 0/2] block: discard alignment fixes Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-04-14 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] file-posix: probe discard alignment on Linux block devices Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-04-17 16:27 ` Eric Blake
2025-04-17 16:31 ` Eric Blake
2025-04-14 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] block/io: skip head/tail requests on EINVAL Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-04-17 8:49 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2025-04-17 15:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-04-17 15:32 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aADAs7oerG789LTI@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.