From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, lina@asahilina.net,
daniel.almeida@collabora.com, j@jannau.net, alyssa@rosenzweig.io,
ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
benno.lossin@proton.me, a.hindborg@kernel.org,
aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] rust: drm: gem: Add GEM object abstraction
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAFlMmZxa8V-SFn7@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ea450fdef728a5c783738c0770ea38ba6db39f2.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:42:24PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 01:55 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > +/// A base GEM object.
> > +///
> > +/// Invariants
> > +///
> > +/// `self.dev` is always a valid pointer to a `struct drm_device`.
> > +#[repr(C)]
> > +#[pin_data]
> > +pub struct Object<T: DriverObject + Send + Sync> {
> > + obj: Opaque<bindings::drm_gem_object>,
> > + dev: ptr::NonNull<bindings::drm_device>,
>
> Not a huge deal but why don't we just use NonNull<device::Device<T::Driver>>
> here?
Yeah, we could indeed also use NonNull<drm::Device<T::Driver>> instead, but I
think it doesn't really make a difference.
We only need it in Object::dev(), and the unsafe call would change from
unsafe { drm::Device::as_ref(self.dev.as_ptr()) }
to
unsafe { &*self.dev.as_ptr() }
I'm fine either way.
> > +// SAFETY: Instances of `Object<T>` are always reference-counted.
> > +unsafe impl<T: DriverObject> crate::types::AlwaysRefCounted for Object<T> {
> > + fn inc_ref(&self) {
> > + // SAFETY: The existence of a shared reference guarantees that the refcount is non-zero.
> > + unsafe { bindings::drm_gem_object_get(self.as_raw()) };
> > + }
> > +
> > + unsafe fn dec_ref(obj: ptr::NonNull<Self>) {
> > + // SAFETY: `obj` is a valid pointer to an `Object<T>`.
> > + let obj = unsafe { obj.as_ref() };
> > +
> > + // SAFETY: The safety requirements guarantee that the refcount is non-zero.
> > + unsafe { bindings::drm_gem_object_put(obj.as_raw()) }
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So - as far as I can tell pretty much every gem object is going to be using
> the same object_get/object_put() functions - so instead of implementing
> AlwaysRefCounted for Object<T> why not handle this the other way around?
>
> unsafe impl<T: IntoGEMObject> AlwaysRefCounted for T {
> /* ... */
> }
>
> That way you can also make IntoGEMObject a super-trait of AlwaysRefCounted, so
> the AlwaysRefCounted trait bound will be implied instead of having to specify
> it manually all over the place.
That is a great idea!
Since the current implementation should be correct, do you want to implement
this improvement in a subsequent patch? :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 23:55 [PATCH v2 0/8] DRM Rust abstractions Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm: drv: implement __drm_dev_alloc() Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 13:27 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-18 21:00 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] rust: drm: ioctl: Add DRM ioctl abstraction Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 13:54 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-18 21:03 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rust: drm: add driver abstractions Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 14:00 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-18 21:06 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rust: drm: add device abstraction Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 14:07 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-17 18:53 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-17 20:20 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] rust: drm: add DRM driver registration Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 14:11 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-18 21:12 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] rust: drm: file: Add File abstraction Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 14:28 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-18 21:15 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rust: drm: gem: Add GEM object abstraction Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 15:07 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-17 18:42 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-17 20:31 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-04-17 22:33 ` Lyude Paul
2025-04-18 5:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-05-12 11:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-12 11:48 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-12 12:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-05-12 12:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-10 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] MAINTAINERS: add DRM Rust source files to DRM DRIVERS Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-14 15:08 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-04-18 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] DRM Rust abstractions Lyude Paul
2025-04-24 13:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-18 23:31 [PATCH v2 0/8] DRM Rust abstractions and Nova Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-18 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rust: drm: gem: Add GEM object abstraction Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAFlMmZxa8V-SFn7@cassiopeiae \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=j@jannau.net \
--cc=lina@asahilina.net \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.