Re: [PATCHv3 perf/core 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add 5-byte nop uprobe trigger bench

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 1:37 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Add 5-byte nop uprobe trigger bench (x86_64 specific) to measure
> > uprobes/uretprobes on top of nop5 instruction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           | 12 ++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c      | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_uprobes.sh |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> 
> LGTM. Should we land this benchmark patch through the bpf-next tree?
> It won't break anything, just will be slower until patch #1 gets into
> bpf-next as well, which is fine.
> 
> Ingo or Peter, any objections to me routing this patch separately
> through bpf-next?
> 
> But either way:
> 
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

I've applied this to the perf tree with a few readability edits to the 
changelogs and the new tags added in.

Thanks,

	Ingo