All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Potential issue with pci_prepare_to_sleep if there's no platform support for D3cold transition
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:27:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAc26NTVcXy1BCxU@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62de9027-e4cd-4192-90e8-64f4c4a8fe4b@gmail.com>

[cc += Rafael, linux-acpi]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:05:59PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> If there's no platform support for transition to D3cold, then
> pci_set_power_state(dev, D3cold) still returns 0, even though
> power state is transitioned to D3hot only. We called
> pci_enable_wake(dev, D3cold, wakeup) before, therefore PME for
> D3hot may not be enabled. Is this a bug?
> 
> Background:
> In __pci_set_power_state we have the following:
> 
> error = pci_set_low_power_state(dev, PCI_D3hot, locked);
> if (pci_platform_power_transition(dev, PCI_D3cold))
> 	return error;
> 
> The acpi_pci_set_power_state() stub returns -ENODEV.
> Therefore, if error=0,  __pci_set_power_state() will
> return 0 if pci_platform_power_transition() fails.

pci_prepare_to_sleep() calls pci_target_state() right at the top.

If wakeup is supported and enabled, pci_target_state() is supposed
to find the deepest power state supporting wakeup.  If D3cold doesn't
support wakeup, D3hot or a shallower state is returned.

Hence I don't quite understand how the scenario you're describing
could occur in practice.  Are you seeing actual issues and have tracked
them down to incorrect handling in pci_prepare_to_sleep()?

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-22  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-21 20:05 Potential issue with pci_prepare_to_sleep if there's no platform support for D3cold transition Heiner Kallweit
2025-04-22  6:27 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-04-22 11:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-23  9:32     ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-04-23  9:45       ` Heiner Kallweit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAc26NTVcXy1BCxU@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.