All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Mathew McBride <matt@traverse.com.au>
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] net: pcs-lynx: 10G SFP no longer links up
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:03:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAe94Tkf-IYjswfP@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <025c0ebe-5537-4fa3-b05a-8b835e5ad317@app.fastmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 01:02:19PM +1000, Mathew McBride wrote:
> #regzbot introduced: 6561f0e547be221f411fda5eddfcc5bd8bb058a5
> 
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024, at 8:42 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Report the PCS in-band capabilities to phylink for the Lynx PCS.
> > 
> 
> The implementation of in-band capabilities has broken SFP+ (10GBase-R) mode on my LS1088 board.
> The other ports in the system (QSGMII) work fine.

Thanks for the report.

Please try the diff below:

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
index 1bdd5d8bb5b0..2147e2d3003a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
@@ -3624,6 +3624,15 @@ static int phylink_sfp_config_optical(struct phylink *pl)
 	phylink_dbg(pl, "optical SFP: chosen %s interface\n",
 		    phy_modes(interface));
 
+	/* GBASE-R interfaces with the exception of KR do not have autoneg at
+	 * the PCS. As the PCS is media facing, disable the Autoneg bit in the
+	 * advertisement.
+	 */
+	if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_5GBASER ||
+	    interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER ||
+	    interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_25GBASER)
+		__clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Autoneg_BIT, config.advertising);
+
 	if (!phylink_validate_pcs_inband_autoneg(pl, interface,
 						 config.advertising)) {
 		phylink_err(pl, "autoneg setting not compatible with PCS");

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-22 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-05  9:42 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: net: add negotiation of in-band capabilities (remainder) Russell King (Oracle)
2024-12-05  9:42 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: pcs: pcs-lynx: implement pcs_inband_caps() method Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-18  3:02   ` [REGRESSION] net: pcs-lynx: 10G SFP no longer links up Mathew McBride
2025-04-22 16:03     ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-04-23  9:01       ` Mathew McBride
2025-07-10  5:29         ` Mathew McBride
2025-08-12 12:17           ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2025-08-12 16:42             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-08-15 10:18               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-08-18  9:59               ` Mathew McBride
2025-07-13 15:02   ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: pcs: pcs-lynx: implement pcs_inband_caps() method Josua Mayer
2024-12-05  9:42 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: pcs: pcs-mtk-lynxi: " Russell King (Oracle)
2024-12-08  3:01   ` Daniel Golle
2024-12-08  9:13     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-01-02 12:26       ` Daniel Golle
2025-01-03 10:55         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-12-17  7:49   ` Eric Woudstra
2025-01-02  8:59     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-01-02 12:32       ` Daniel Golle
2024-12-05  9:42 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: pcs: xpcs: " Russell King (Oracle)
2024-12-08  2:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: net: add negotiation of in-band capabilities (remainder) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAe94Tkf-IYjswfP@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@traverse.com.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.