From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ruihan Li <lrh2000@pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:11:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAjK8Yq3OJH5hP12@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423081828.608422-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 08:52:45AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> Implement for_each_valid_pfn() based on two helper functions.
>
> The first_valid_pfn() function largely mirrors pfn_valid(), calling into
> a pfn_section_first_valid() helper which is trivial for the !VMEMMAP case,
> and in the VMEMMAP case will skip to the next subsection as needed.
>
> Since next_valid_pfn() knows that its argument *is* a valid PFN, it
> doesn't need to do any checking at all while iterating over the low bits
> within a (sub)section mask; the whole (sub)section is either present or
> not.
>
> Note that the VMEMMAP version of pfn_section_first_valid() may return a
> value *higher* than end_pfn when skipping to the next subsection, and
> first_valid_pfn() happily returns that higher value. This is fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Previous-revision-reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h | 26 ++++++++--
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> index 74d0077cc5fa..044536da3390 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> @@ -31,12 +31,28 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> }
> #define pfn_valid pfn_valid
>
> +static inline bool first_valid_pfn(unsigned long *pfn)
> +{
> + /* avoid <linux/mm.h> include hell */
> + extern unsigned long max_mapnr;
> + unsigned long pfn_offset = ARCH_PFN_OFFSET;
> +
> + if (*pfn < pfn_offset) {
> + *pfn = pfn_offset;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if ((*pfn - pfn_offset) < max_mapnr)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
Looks like it's a leftover from one of the previous versions.
> #ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
> -#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
> - for ((pfn) = max_t(unsigned long, (start_pfn), ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
> - (pfn) < min_t(unsigned long, (end_pfn), \
> - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
> - (pfn)++)
> +#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
> + for (pfn = max_t(unsigned long, start_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
> + pfn < min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
> + pfn++)
And this one is probably a rebase artifact?
With FLATMEM changes dropped
This-revision-also-reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> #endif /* for_each_valid_pfn */
> #endif /* valid_pfn */
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 7:52 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:11 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-04-23 12:05 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm, PM: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in kernel/power/snapshot.c David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm, x86: Use for_each_valid_pfn() from __ioremap_check_ram() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm/mm_init: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in init_unavailable_range() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 9:35 ` Ruihan Li
2025-04-23 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAjK8Yq3OJH5hP12@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lrh2000@pku.edu.cn \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.