From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBD65275111 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745441807; cv=none; b=i9XO2yn6bwgeJefKkr5J0OwIsgK+VgC9ooFDP43SCk5FgcWhcqc/yKuPbMIlSwtD0YPmnRx118UaW9GCTfH7QNg1i3N+tFEvsvF6xRVvXfL2MZ0krRge6BkEDu3Prb06Cr7ATlZO8XqMz9mLukV9BHgkC+PX//mWmCazgxpQkSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745441807; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Obwqw1tRlj0+npbEGpU1B3WEVljZpsZdUwo1+gl2g/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t3POLQTTFuX1Y7lHzLn7rbpxjtq1KDcUKPSnWYnAOY1OTMdhBB+Ud8ENnUUsKH5tzDpBb+MNH+cdAGMqzstfrn2H08Fd9PlLWu0AU9X6NUddtm2v5xFBlx9l++IsODs0VUY4d4zceW2+8Lzunct5JNO55aVmXf1Lt6Sg54x30n8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=OAbx6RtN; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=OAbx6RtN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="OAbx6RtN"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="OAbx6RtN" Received: by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id F162760902; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:56:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1745441801; bh=145pqXqFe7UW84xWYZVS/IyiP9lQBBL451dD4Kxv7TY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OAbx6RtNZkQiWr8RGvJdTISCe8p/9lAzTez2Azx/qnVjneIj3KmzDVuW/KIf/bduf RWKwB1LWXCmfBcMmEAA3pwCklCMCMGt/mAKE25qVhWEfBJPKvcB8vhjSCzlceBSA6G ET7xorRR7EcqM80UzJUWKhcAnNVGdr1obVcD0TlIn7vq8O2VpLXUYGnn2BK4PVsmjZ 8vugBq/sQ63+1zBz8Mc9LThbR15R/KmXogm/LmqhRpOpUSOLPHREiRzXkVOI8GIg9O hdMW+sFvX4l911Q2KUbYu/famyX5FiHJ1PZgmh3QjU3Uy+AP0yTAwp8FYBMHClNmMQ oWg+Vg1ZE5Ebw== X-Spam-Level: Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39552608D2; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:56:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1745441801; bh=145pqXqFe7UW84xWYZVS/IyiP9lQBBL451dD4Kxv7TY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OAbx6RtNZkQiWr8RGvJdTISCe8p/9lAzTez2Azx/qnVjneIj3KmzDVuW/KIf/bduf RWKwB1LWXCmfBcMmEAA3pwCklCMCMGt/mAKE25qVhWEfBJPKvcB8vhjSCzlceBSA6G ET7xorRR7EcqM80UzJUWKhcAnNVGdr1obVcD0TlIn7vq8O2VpLXUYGnn2BK4PVsmjZ 8vugBq/sQ63+1zBz8Mc9LThbR15R/KmXogm/LmqhRpOpUSOLPHREiRzXkVOI8GIg9O hdMW+sFvX4l911Q2KUbYu/famyX5FiHJ1PZgmh3QjU3Uy+AP0yTAwp8FYBMHClNmMQ oWg+Vg1ZE5Ebw== Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:56:38 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: Slavko , netfilter ML Subject: Re: nftables RP filter and loopback Message-ID: References: <905173BB-6745-4B59-8795-F9AC1E063A38@slavino.sk> <20250422114352.GA2092@breakpoint.cc> <622E44D0-8F02-4663-ABAD-01497C7D6692@slavino.sk> <20250422125351.GC2092@breakpoint.cc> <20250423091020.GA4038@breakpoint.cc> <20250423120605.GB7371@breakpoint.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250423120605.GB7371@breakpoint.cc> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:06:05PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > Yes, I didn't notice either. Anyway, unless you can forecast any > > issue, I'd suggest to backport the entire patch? IIRC patch is > > relatively small and keeping it in sync with main could possibly help > > with cherrypicking fixes. > > Right, it would keep -stable "bug compatible" too. > > Maybe its ok to ask to cherry-pick it as is for > 6.14 and 6.12. OK, let's request this cherry-pick for 6.12. Thanks > 6.13 is EOL already, 6.12 is longterm. > > This would leave 6.6 and 6.1 longterm out but from lack > of bug reports so far I would not say its a prominent bug. > > The upstream patch cherry-picks for all except 6.1.y, but > AFAICS its just a simple context conflict. > > Earlier longterm kernels aren't affected.