From: dmkhn@proton.me
To: Alejandro Vallejo <agarciav@amd.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@vates.tech>,
"Michal Orzel" <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Bertrand Marquis" <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Hyperlaunch device tree for dom0
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 22:19:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAq41+qsbuJP2JOj@kraken> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424161027.92942-1-agarciav@amd.com>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:10:10PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20250417124844.11143-1-agarciav@amd.com/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20250408160802.49870-1-agarciav@amd.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20241226165740.29812-1-dpsmith@apertussolutions.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20241123182044.30687-1-dpsmith@apertussolutions.com/
>
> ========= Original cover letter:
>
> The Hyperlaunch device tree for dom0 series is the second split out for the
> introduction of the Hyperlaunch domain builder logic. These changes focus on
> introducing the ability to express a domain configuration that is then used to
> populate the struct boot_domain structure for dom0. This ability to express a
> domain configuration provides the next step towards a general domain builder.
>
> The splitting of Hyperlaunch into a set of series are twofold, to reduce the
> effort in reviewing a much larger series, and to reduce the effort in handling
> the knock-on effects to the construction logic from requested review changes.
>
>
>
> Alejandro Vallejo (1):
> x86/hyperlaunch: Add helpers to locate multiboot modules
>
> Daniel P. Smith (11):
> kconfig: introduce domain builder config options
> common/hyperlaunch: introduce the domain builder
> x86/hyperlaunch: initial support for hyperlaunch device tree
> x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 kernel with hyperlaunch
> x86/hyperlaunch: obtain cmdline from device tree
> x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 initrd with hyperlaunch
> x86/hyperlaunch: add domain id parsing to domain config
> x86/hyperlaunch: specify dom0 mode with device tree
> x86/hyperlaunch: add memory parsing to domain config
> x86/hyperlaunch: add max vcpu parsing of hyperlaunch device tree
> x86/hyperlaunch: add capabilities to boot domain
One general comment w.r.t. naming notation in:
xen/common/domain-builder/fdt.c
xen/common/domain-builder/fdt.h
Sorry, overlooked that earlier.
What do you think about using fdt_<something> notation for all functions in
fdt.{c,h}?
For example:
s/detect_fdt_kind/fdt_detect_hyperlauch_node/
s/find_hyperlaunch_node/fdt_find_hyperlauch_node/
s/walk_hyperlaunch_fdt/fdt_walk_hyperlauch_node/
s/process_domain_node/fdt_process_hyperlauch_node/
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@ford.com>
for the series.
>
> xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c | 11 +
> xen/arch/x86/include/asm/boot-domain.h | 14 +
> xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h | 10 +-
> xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 64 +++-
> xen/common/Kconfig | 2 +
> xen/common/Makefile | 1 +
> xen/common/domain-builder/Kconfig | 15 +
> xen/common/domain-builder/Makefile | 2 +
> xen/common/domain-builder/core.c | 86 +++++
> xen/common/domain-builder/fdt.c | 512 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/common/domain-builder/fdt.h | 40 ++
> xen/include/xen/domain-builder.h | 37 ++
> xen/include/xen/libfdt/libfdt-xen.h | 23 ++
> 13 files changed, 800 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 xen/common/domain-builder/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 xen/common/domain-builder/Makefile
> create mode 100644 xen/common/domain-builder/core.c
> create mode 100644 xen/common/domain-builder/fdt.c
> create mode 100644 xen/common/domain-builder/fdt.h
> create mode 100644 xen/include/xen/domain-builder.h
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 16:10 [PATCH v5 00/12] Hyperlaunch device tree for dom0 Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] kconfig: introduce domain builder config options Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:54 ` Jason Andryuk
2025-04-25 12:40 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] common/hyperlaunch: introduce the domain builder Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] x86/hyperlaunch: initial support for hyperlaunch device tree Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] x86/hyperlaunch: Add helpers to locate multiboot modules Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 kernel with hyperlaunch Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-25 22:32 ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-04-28 11:05 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] x86/hyperlaunch: obtain cmdline from device tree Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 initrd with hyperlaunch Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] x86/hyperlaunch: add domain id parsing to domain config Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 17:41 ` Jason Andryuk
2025-04-25 12:43 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] x86/hyperlaunch: specify dom0 mode with device tree Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] x86/hyperlaunch: add memory parsing to domain config Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] x86/hyperlaunch: add max vcpu parsing of hyperlaunch device tree Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] x86/hyperlaunch: add capabilities to boot domain Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-25 15:32 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-24 22:19 ` dmkhn [this message]
2025-04-25 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Hyperlaunch device tree for dom0 Alejandro Vallejo
2025-04-25 14:48 ` dmkhn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAq41+qsbuJP2JOj@kraken \
--to=dmkhn@proton.me \
--cc=agarciav@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@vates.tech \
--cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.