All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>,
	 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: flush all pending jobs in destroy_workqueue()
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:33:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAtXApA8ggJa6sQg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAqXw3t9UVU8pF8_@slm.duckdns.org>

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:57:55AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Alice.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:51:27PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -367,6 +367,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
> >  	struct lockdep_map	__lockdep_map;
> >  	struct lockdep_map	*lockdep_map;
> >  #endif
> > +	raw_spinlock_t		delayed_lock;	/* protects pending_list */
> > +	struct list_head	delayed_list;	/* list of pending delayed jobs */
> 
> I think we'll have to make this per-CPU or per-pwq. There can be a lot of
> delayed work items being queued on, e.g., system_wq. Imagine that happening
> on a multi-socket NUMA system. That cacheline is going to be bounced around
> pretty hard.

Hmm. I think we would need to add a new field to delayed_work to keep
track of which list it has been added to.

Another option could be to add a boolean that disables the list. After
all, we never call destroy_workqueue() on system_wq so we don't need the
list for that workqueue.

Thoughts?

Alice

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-25  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-23 17:51 [PATCH] workqueue: flush all pending jobs in destroy_workqueue() Alice Ryhl
2025-04-24 19:57 ` Tejun Heo
2025-04-25  9:33   ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2025-04-25  9:57     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-25 19:25     ` Tejun Heo
2025-04-28  9:32       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-04-28 18:30         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAtXApA8ggJa6sQg@google.com \
    --to=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phasta@mailbox.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.