All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenbus: Use kref to track req lifetime
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 22:18:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aB0Rmd1PCxA_7Gch@mail-itl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506210935.5607-1-jason.andryuk@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2055 bytes --]

On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 05:09:33PM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> Marek reported seeing a NULL pointer fault in the xenbus_thread
> callstack:
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> RIP: e030:__wake_up_common+0x4c/0x180
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  __wake_up_common_lock+0x82/0xd0
>  process_msg+0x18e/0x2f0
>  xenbus_thread+0x165/0x1c0
> 
> process_msg+0x18e is req->cb(req).  req->cb is set to xs_wake_up(), a
> thin wrapper around wake_up(), or xenbus_dev_queue_reply().  It seems
> like it was xs_wake_up() in this case.
> 
> It seems like req may have woken up the xs_wait_for_reply(), which
> kfree()ed the req.  When xenbus_thread resumes, it faults on the zero-ed
> data.
> 
> Linux Device Drivers 2nd edition states:
> "Normally, a wake_up call can cause an immediate reschedule to happen,
> meaning that other processes might run before wake_up returns."
> ... which would match the behaviour observed.
> 
> Change to keeping two krefs on each request.  One for the caller, and
> one for xenbus_thread.  Each will kref_put() when finished, and the last
> will free it.
> 
> This use of kref matches the description in
> Documentation/core-api/kref.rst
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/ZO0WrR5J0xuwDIxW@mail-itl/
> Reported-by: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
> Fixes: fd8aa9095a95 ("xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
> ---
> Kinda RFC-ish as I don't know if it fixes Marek's issue.  This does seem
> like the correct approach if we are seeing req free()ed out from under
> xenbus_thread.

Thanks for the patch! I don't have easy way to test if it definitely
fixes the issues (due to poor reproduction rate), but it looks very
likely. I did run it through our CI and at least there it didn't crash
(but again, it doesn't happen often).

-- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 21:09 [PATCH] xenbus: Use kref to track req lifetime Jason Andryuk
2025-05-07  9:27 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-05-07 14:16   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-05-08 20:18 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aB0Rmd1PCxA_7Gch@mail-itl \
    --to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jason.andryuk@amd.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.