From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: always allocate integrity buffer when required
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 08:33:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aB4SHKuSiuewRltB@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509041949.GA28563@lst.de>
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 06:19:49AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 10:58:14AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Add a new blk_integrity flag to indicate if the disk format requires an
> > integrity buffer. When this flag is set, provide an unchecked buffer if
> > the sysfs attributes disabled verify or generation. This fixes the
> > following nvme warning:
>
> Do we even need the flag? I think we could just deduce it from
> tag_size < tuple_size, which feels more robust.
It looks like tag_size just refers to the space for the "application
tag", which can vary depending on if ref_tag is used or not. But it's
always going to be smaller than the tuple size.
I think you mean 'if tuple_size == sizeof(struct {t10|crc64}_pi_tuple)',
depending on which csum type is used. I introduced a new flag because I
thought that gen/strip property was just an arbitrary decision that NVMe
made for PRACT, but if it's a universal thing, then we can totally use
that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 17:58 [PATCH] block: always allocate integrity buffer when required Keith Busch
2025-05-09 4:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-09 14:33 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-05-09 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aB4SHKuSiuewRltB@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.