All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.15 1/3] selftests: ublk: fix UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:53:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBAi7GdSjMf-Latb@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADUfDZqd_9c191pfNSmkm2Oz544V1auOcsCJtMnpj03Y-3vohA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:51:03AM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 6:49 AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 57e13a2e8cd2 ("selftests: ublk: support user recovery") starts to
> > support UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA for covering recovery feature, however the
> > ublk utility implementation isn't done correctly.
> >
> > Fix it by supporting UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA correctly.
> >
> > Also add test generic_07 for covering UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> > Fixes: 57e13a2e8cd2 ("selftests: ublk: support user recovery")
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile         |  1 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c          | 20 ++++++++++------
> >  tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h          |  1 +
> >  .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_07.sh | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh  |  8 +++----
> >  5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_07.sh
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile
> > index ec4624a283bc..f34ac0bac696 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ TEST_PROGS += test_generic_03.sh
> >  TEST_PROGS += test_generic_04.sh
> >  TEST_PROGS += test_generic_05.sh
> >  TEST_PROGS += test_generic_06.sh
> > +TEST_PROGS += test_generic_07.sh
> >
> >  TEST_PROGS += test_null_01.sh
> >  TEST_PROGS += test_null_02.sh
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> > index e57a1486bb48..3afd45d7f989 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> > @@ -536,12 +536,17 @@ int ublk_queue_io_cmd(struct ublk_queue *q, struct ublk_io *io, unsigned tag)
> >         if (!(io->flags & UBLKSRV_IO_FREE))
> >                 return 0;
> >
> > -       /* we issue because we need either fetching or committing */
> > +       /*
> > +        * we issue because we need either fetching or committing or
> > +        * getting data
> > +        */
> >         if (!(io->flags &
> > -               (UBLKSRV_NEED_FETCH_RQ | UBLKSRV_NEED_COMMIT_RQ_COMP)))
> > +               (UBLKSRV_NEED_FETCH_RQ | UBLKSRV_NEED_COMMIT_RQ_COMP | UBLKSRV_NEED_GET_DATA)))
> >                 return 0;
> >
> > -       if (io->flags & UBLKSRV_NEED_COMMIT_RQ_COMP)
> > +       if (io->flags & UBLKSRV_NEED_GET_DATA)
> > +               cmd_op = UBLK_U_IO_NEED_GET_DATA;
> > +       else if (io->flags & UBLKSRV_NEED_COMMIT_RQ_COMP)
> >                 cmd_op = UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ;
> >         else if (io->flags & UBLKSRV_NEED_FETCH_RQ)
> >                 cmd_op = UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_REQ;
> > @@ -658,6 +663,9 @@ static void ublk_handle_cqe(struct io_uring *r,
> >                 assert(tag < q->q_depth);
> >                 if (q->tgt_ops->queue_io)
> >                         q->tgt_ops->queue_io(q, tag);
> > +       } else if (cqe->res == UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA) {
> > +               io->flags |= UBLKSRV_NEED_GET_DATA | UBLKSRV_IO_FREE;
> > +               ublk_queue_io_cmd(q, io, tag);
> >         } else {
> >                 /*
> >                  * COMMIT_REQ will be completed immediately since no fetching
> > @@ -1313,7 +1321,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >
> >         opterr = 0;
> >         optind = 2;
> > -       while ((opt = getopt_long(argc, argv, "t:n:d:q:r:e:i:az",
> > +       while ((opt = getopt_long(argc, argv, "t:n:d:q:r:e:i:gaz",
> >                                   longopts, &option_idx)) != -1) {
> >                 switch (opt) {
> >                 case 'a':
> > @@ -1351,9 +1359,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >                                 ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE;
> >                         break;
> >                 case 'g':
> > -                       value = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
> > -                       if (value)
> > -                               ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA;
> > +                       ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA;
> 
> The help text in __cmd_create_help() should be updated accordingly.

Good catch!

> 
> >                         break;
> >                 case 0:
> >                         if (!strcmp(longopts[option_idx].name, "debug_mask"))
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h
> > index 918db5cd633f..44ee1e4ac55b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h
> > @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct ublk_io {
> >  #define UBLKSRV_NEED_FETCH_RQ          (1UL << 0)
> >  #define UBLKSRV_NEED_COMMIT_RQ_COMP    (1UL << 1)
> >  #define UBLKSRV_IO_FREE                        (1UL << 2)
> > +#define UBLKSRV_NEED_GET_DATA           (1UL << 3)
> >         unsigned short flags;
> >         unsigned short refs;            /* used by target code only */
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_07.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_07.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..e3ad36ef7b9a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_07.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +. "$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"/test_common.sh
> > +
> > +TID="generic_07"
> > +ERR_CODE=0
> > +
> > +_prep_test "generic" "test UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA"
> > +
> > +_create_backfile 0 256M
> > +dev_id=$(_add_ublk_dev -t loop -q 2 -g "${UBLK_BACKFILES[0]}")
> > +_check_add_dev $TID $?
> > +
> > +# run fio over the ublk disk
> > +_run_fio_verify_io --filename=/dev/ublkb"${dev_id}" --size=256M
> 
> I thought you were planning to add a _have_program fio check?

Indeed, don't know how the check wasn't added, :-(


thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-27 13:49 [PATCH v6.15 0/3] ublk: one selftest fix and two zero copy fixes Ming Lei
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 1/3] selftests: ublk: fix UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA Ming Lei
2025-04-28 15:51   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29  0:53     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 2/3] ublk: decouple zero copy from user copy Ming Lei
2025-04-28 16:01   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29  0:55     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29  1:36       ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29  1:38         ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 3/3] ublk: enhance check for register/unregister io buffer command Ming Lei
2025-04-28 16:28   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29  1:02     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29  1:03       ` Caleb Sander Mateos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBAi7GdSjMf-Latb@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.