From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
"Michael R . Galaxy" <mrgalaxy@nvidia.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qtest/migration/rdma: Add test for rdma migration with ipv6
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:52:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBKbr3aVAxAwt2rD@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <396fcfe6-7ddb-41e7-ae28-e5210dea7dd7@fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:49:40AM +0000, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
>
>
> On 30/04/2025 16:48, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) via wrote:
> >>> stderr:
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: cannot get rkey
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: error while loading state section id 2(ram)
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: load of migration failed: Operation not permitted
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: rdma migration: recv polling control error!
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: RDMA is in an error state waiting migration to abort!
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to save SaveStateEntry with id(name): 2(ram): -1
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: Channel error: Operation not permitted
> >>> **
> >>> ERROR:../tests/qtest/migration/migration-qmp.c:200:check_migration_status: assertion failed (current_status != "failed"): ("failed" != "failed")
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Early error. Sending error.
> >>> qemu-system-x86_64: warning: rdma migration: send polling control error
> >>> ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:199: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0)
> >>>
> >>> So running the test also needs root? Is it possible we fix the test so it
> >>> can also be smart enough to skip if it knows it'll hit the "cannot get
> >>> rkey" error (even if it sees the rdma link setup)? Not something urgent
> >>> but definitely good to have.
> > It seems it's a security problem, I have no a good idea yet.
> >
> > Let me see see...
>
> Another workaround is update the 'ulimit -l' to >=128M for a non-root user(in practice
> this value works well on fedora40)
OK so it's about the locked mem.. thanks for looking.
>
> So we would have something like this:
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/migration/precopy-tests.c b/tests/qtest/migration/precopy-tests.c
> index 9f7236dc59f..1f24753c5a5 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/migration/precopy-tests.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/migration/precopy-tests.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,26 @@ static void test_precopy_unix_dirty_ring(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RDMA
>
> +#include <sys/resource.h>
> +#define REQUIRED_MEMLOCK (128 * 1024 * 1024) // 128MB
How does the 128M come from? Is it correlated to the VM size somehow?
Btw, migrate_start() says for x86 we use 150MB VM.
When you feel confident, feel free to send a formal patch, it can also
include the reposted version of the current patch so that can be a series.
It'll also be great if you could make sure they apply on top of:
https://gitlab.com/peterx/qemu/-/tree/migration-staging
Thanks,
> +
> +static bool mlock_check(void)
> +{
> + uid_t uid;
> + struct rlimit rlim;
> +
> + uid = getuid();
> + if (uid == 0) {
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim) != 0) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return rlim.rlim_cur >= REQUIRED_MEMLOCK;
> +}
> +
> #define RDMA_MIGRATION_HELPER "scripts/rdma-migration-helper.sh"
> static int new_rdma_link(char *buffer, bool ipv6)
> {
> @@ -137,6 +157,11 @@ static void test_precopy_rdma_plain_ip(bool ipv6)
> {
> char buffer[128] = {};
>
> + if (!mlock_check()) {
> + g_test_skip("'ulimit -l' is too small, require 128M");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (new_rdma_link(buffer, ipv6)) {
> g_test_skip("No rdma link available\n"
> "# To enable the test:\n"
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 2:12 [PATCH] qtest/migration/rdma: Add test for rdma migration with ipv6 Li Zhijian via
2025-03-27 6:17 ` Jinpu Wang
2025-04-29 21:09 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-30 8:28 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) via
2025-04-30 8:48 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) via
2025-04-30 9:49 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) via
2025-04-30 21:52 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-05-07 7:02 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBKbr3aVAxAwt2rD@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mrgalaxy@nvidia.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yu.zhang@ionos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.