Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: fix devcoredump chunk alignmnent calculation

[Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 06:25:45PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> The device core dumps are copied in 1.5GB chunks, which leads to a
> link-time error on 32-bit builds because of the 64-bit division not
> getting trivially turned into mask and shift operations:
> 
> ERROR: modpost: "__moddi3" [drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe.ko] undefined!
> 
> On top of this, I noticed that the ALIGN_DOWN() usage here cannot
> work because that is only defined for power-of-two alignments.
> Change ALIGN_DOWN into an explicit div_u64_rem() that avoids the
> link error and hopefully produces the right results.
> 
> Doing a 1.5GB kvmalloc() does seem a bit suspicious as well, e.g.
> this will clearly fail on any 32-bit platform and is also likely
> to run out of memory on 64-bit systems under memory pressure, so
> using a much smaller power-of-two chunk size might be a good idea
> instead.
> 
> v2:
>  - Always call div_u64_rem (Matt)
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes:  https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504251238.JsNgFeFc-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: c4a2e5f865b7 ("drm/xe: Add devcoredump chunking")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> index a9e618abf8ac..7a8af2311318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>  	struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = data;
>  	struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss;
>  	ssize_t byte_copied;
> +	u32 chunk_offset;
> +	ssize_t new_chunk_position;
>  
>  	if (!coredump)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -201,10 +203,14 @@ static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> +	new_chunk_position = div_u64_rem(offset,
> +					 XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX,
> +					 &chunk_offset);
> +
>  	if (offset >= ss->read.chunk_position + XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX ||
>  	    offset < ss->read.chunk_position) {
> -		ss->read.chunk_position =
> -			ALIGN_DOWN(offset, XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX);
> +		ss->read.chunk_position = new_chunk_position *
> +			XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX;
>  
>  		__xe_devcoredump_read(ss->read.buffer,
>  				      XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX,
> @@ -213,8 +219,7 @@ static ssize_t xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>  
>  	byte_copied = count < ss->read.size - offset ? count :
>  		ss->read.size - offset;
> -	memcpy(buffer, ss->read.buffer +
> -	       (offset % XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX), byte_copied);
> +	memcpy(buffer, ss->read.buffer + chunk_offset, byte_copied);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&coredump->lock);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>