All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:48:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBiJdTDs_YP0AYVb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in
another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb
information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace.

As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using
bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec
decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1)
the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM
layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at
each function.

    NETNS       MARK  IFACE  TUPLE                                FUNC
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  xfrm_rcv_cb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  xfrm4_rcv_cb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026533547  d00   eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  gro_cells_receive
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    [...]
    4026533547  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  skb_do_redirect
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  ip_rcv
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  ip_rcv_core
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    [...]
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  udp_queue_rcv_one_skb
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  __xfrm_policy_check
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  __xfrm_decode_session
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  security_xfrm_decode_session
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,
    4026534999  0     eth0   10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53  kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY)
                             .active_extensions = (__u8)2,

In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network
namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet,
the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This
information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the
XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops
the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM
policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for
decryption.

This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using
bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth
devices.

Fixes: 9aa1206e8f482 ("bpf: Add redirect_peer helper")
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 79cab4d78dc3..12b6b8dbeb51 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -2509,6 +2509,7 @@ int skb_do_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
 			goto out_drop;
 		skb->dev = dev;
 		dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(dev, skb->len);
+		skb_scrub_packet(skb, true);
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 	return flags & BPF_F_NEIGH ?
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05  9:48 Paul Chaignon [this message]
2025-05-05 10:01 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer Daniel Borkmann
2025-05-05 20:01   ` Paul Chaignon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBiJdTDs_YP0AYVb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.