All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	<riana.tauro@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_sysfs.c
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 15:09:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBkM9q-BksNG7D5i@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505053716.3360242-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 11:07:16AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Introduce xe_pm_sysfs.c for Power Management knobs and move existing
> attributes to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> This depends on BMG PCIe link downgrade series[1].
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502183739.3308069-1-raag.jadav@intel.com
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile          |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c | 64 +---------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.h |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c           |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.c     | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.h     | 13 +++++
>  6 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index c5d6681645ed..683b5a7073ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>  	xe_pci.o \
>  	xe_pcode.o \
>  	xe_pm.o \
> +	xe_pm_sysfs.o \
>  	xe_preempt_fence.o \
>  	xe_pt.o \
>  	xe_pt_walk.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> index 7172972b5b60..cdea5e5ebf3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> @@ -3,12 +3,11 @@
>   * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/kobject.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  
> -#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> -
>  #include "xe_device.h"
>  #include "xe_device_sysfs.h"
>  #include "xe_mmio.h"
> @@ -22,69 +21,8 @@
>   * each graphics device. Considering this, we need to add sysfs attributes at device
>   * level granularity.
>   * These sysfs attributes will be available under pci device kobj directory.
> - *
> - * vram_d3cold_threshold - Report/change vram used threshold(in MB) below
> - * which vram save/restore is permissible during runtime D3cold entry/exit.
>   */
>  
> -static ssize_t
> -vram_d3cold_threshold_show(struct device *dev,
> -			   struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> -{
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> -	ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", xe->d3cold.vram_threshold);
> -	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> -
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static ssize_t
> -vram_d3cold_threshold_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> -			    const char *buff, size_t count)
> -{
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> -	u32 vram_d3cold_threshold;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &vram_d3cold_threshold);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "vram_d3cold_threshold: %u\n", vram_d3cold_threshold);
> -
> -	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> -	ret = xe_pm_set_vram_threshold(xe, vram_d3cold_threshold);
> -	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> -
> -	return ret ?: count;
> -}
> -
> -static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(vram_d3cold_threshold);
> -
> -static void xe_pm_sysfs_fini(void *arg)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> -
> -	sysfs_remove_file(&xe->drm.dev->kobj, &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr);
> -}
> -
> -int xe_pm_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> -{
> -	struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, xe_pm_sysfs_fini, xe);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * DOC: PCIe Gen5 Limitations
>   *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.h
> index b557db0a6023..f9e83d8bd2c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.h
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
>  
>  struct xe_device;
>  
> -int xe_pm_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_device_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe);

yeap, clearly 'xe_pm' here is bad...
But I don't believe that making a new component make things better.

Because pm_sysfs can be many things and in many layer, device, tile or gt.

So, perhaps we add a 'xe_device_pm_sysfs, or perhaps we just kill this
pm_sysfs_init functions and move that to inisde the device_sysfs_init
and add the logic of creating it or not inside it.

>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index 183813e43b29..365ce76b14ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -16,12 +16,12 @@
>  #include "xe_bo.h"
>  #include "xe_bo_evict.h"
>  #include "xe_device.h"
> -#include "xe_device_sysfs.h"
>  #include "xe_ggtt.h"
>  #include "xe_gt.h"
>  #include "xe_guc.h"
>  #include "xe_irq.h"
>  #include "xe_pcode.h"
> +#include "xe_pm_sysfs.h"
>  #include "xe_pxp.h"
>  #include "xe_trace.h"
>  #include "xe_wa.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..64ddfbf79424
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kobject.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_pm_sysfs.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: Xe PM sysfs
> + * Xe driver requires exposing certain tunable knobs controlled by user space
> + * for Power Management. Considering this, we need to add sysfs attributes for
> + * it. These sysfs attributes will be available under pci device kobj directory.
> + *
> + * vram_d3cold_threshold - Report/change vram used threshold(in MB) below
> + * which vram save/restore is permissible during runtime D3cold entry/exit.
> + */
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +vram_d3cold_threshold_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +	ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", xe->d3cold.vram_threshold);
> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +vram_d3cold_threshold_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			    const char *buff, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> +	u32 vram_d3cold_threshold;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &vram_d3cold_threshold);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "vram_d3cold_threshold: %u\n", vram_d3cold_threshold);
> +
> +	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +	ret = xe_pm_set_vram_threshold(xe, vram_d3cold_threshold);
> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	return ret ?: count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(vram_d3cold_threshold);
> +
> +static void xe_pm_sysfs_fini(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> +
> +	sysfs_remove_file(&xe->drm.dev->kobj, &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr);
> +}
> +
> +int xe_pm_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, xe_pm_sysfs_fini, xe);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9213c178c515
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm_sysfs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_PM_SYSFS_H_
> +#define _XE_PM_SYSFS_H_
> +
> +struct xe_device;
> +
> +int xe_pm_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
> +#endif
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05  5:37 [PATCH v1] drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_sysfs.c Raag Jadav
2025-05-05  6:02 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for " Patchwork
2025-05-05 19:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBkM9q-BksNG7D5i@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.