All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	will@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
	nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com, morbo@google.com,
	justinstitt@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 11:36:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBnmSTsuZKoxxtm8@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cfcd0c5-79a2-45de-8497-fb95ef834dc1@arm.com>

Hi Ryan,

> On 06/05/2025 11:17, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 10:16, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
> >>> On 06/05/2025 09:09, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 09:23:27PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 11:16:12AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 02 May 2025 19:04:12 +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
> >>>>>>>>> which is done in early_map_kernel().
> >>>>>>>>> Therefore, data/test_prot could be set incorrectly by PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> PTE_MAYBE_NG macro set NG bit according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
> >>>>>>>>> and this variable places in .bss section.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), with some slight tweaking of the
> >>>>>>>> comment, thanks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1/1] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
> >>>>>>>>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/12657bcd1835
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm going to drop this for now. The kernel compiled with a clang 19.1.5
> >>>>>>> version I have around (Debian sid) fails to boot, gets stuck early on:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> $ clang --version
> >>>>>>> Debian clang version 19.1.5 (1)
> >>>>>>> Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >>>>>>> Thread model: posix
> >>>>>>> InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-19/bin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I didn't have time to investigate, disassemble etc. I'll have a look
> >>>>>>> next week.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just for your information.
> >>>>>> When I see the debian package, clang 19.1.5-1 doesn't supply anymore:
> >>>>>>  - https://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-19/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and the default version for sid is below:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $ clang-19 --version
> >>>>>> Debian clang version 19.1.7 (3)
> >>>>>> Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >>>>>> Thread model: posix
> >>>>>> InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-19/bin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When I tested with above version with arm64-linux's for-next/fixes
> >>>>>> including this patch. it works well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It doesn't seem to be toolchain related. It fails with gcc as well from
> >>>>> Debian stable but you'd need some older CPU (even if emulated, e.g.
> >>>>> qemu). It fails with Cortex-A72 (guest on Raspberry Pi 4) but not
> >>>>> Neoverse-N2. Also changing the annotation from __ro_after_init to
> >>>>> __read_mostly also works.
> >>>
> >>> I think this is likely because __ro_after_init is also "ro before init" - i.e.
> >>> if you try to write to it in the PI code an exception is generated due to it
> >>> being mapped RO. Looks like early_map_kernel() is writiing to it.
> >>
> >> Indeed.
> >>
> >>> I've noticed a similar problem in the past and it would be nice to fix it so
> >>> that PI code maps __ro_after_init RW.
> >>
> >> The issue is that the store occurs via the ID map, which only consists
> >> of one R-X and one RW- section. I'm not convinced that it's worth the
> >> hassle to relax this.
> >>
> >> If moving the variable to .data works, then let's just do that.
> >
> > Good to know there's no other more serious issue. I'll move this
> > variable to __read_mostly.
> >
> > It seems to fail in early_map_kernel() if RANDOMIZE_BASE is enabled.
>
> Ahh that explains why Yeoreum Yun can't see the issue:
>
> 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)) {
> 		u64 kaslr_seed = kaslr_early_init(fdt, chosen);
>
> 		if (kaslr_seed && kaslr_requires_kpti())
> 			arm64_use_ng_mappings = true;
>
> 		kaslr_offset |= kaslr_seed & ~(MIN_KIMG_ALIGN - 1);
> 	}

Thanks to clarify me to know.
I've misread the address of arm64_use_ng_mapping :( so my brain works wrong.

Thanks again!

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-06 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-02 18:04 [PATCH v2] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-03 10:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 14:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 20:23     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-05 19:05       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06  8:09         ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06  8:15           ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06  8:53             ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:12               ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:38                 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:13               ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06  9:41             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-06 10:08               ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06 10:47                 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:49                   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:57                     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:17               ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:22                 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06 10:29                   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:36                   ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-05-06  9:09           ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:49     ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBnmSTsuZKoxxtm8@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.