All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  peterz@infradead.org,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, weijiang.yang@intel.com,
	 john.allen@amd.com, bp@alien8.de, chang.seok.bae@intel.com,
	xin3.li@intel.com,  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	 Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container from guest defaults
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 10:24:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBpFvyITMc0WhlX4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506093740.2864458-6-chao.gao@intel.com>

On Tue, May 06, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate() currently uses host defaults to initialize guest
> fpstate and pseudo containers. Guest defaults were introduced to
> differentiate the features and sizes of host and guest FPUs. Switch to
> using guest defaults instead.
> 
> Additionally, incorporate the initialization of indicators (is_valloc and
> is_guest) into the newly added guest-specific reset function to centralize
> the resetting of guest fpstate.
> 
> Suggested-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> v6: Drop vcpu_fpu_config.user_* (Rick)
> v5: init is_valloc/is_guest in the guest-specific reset function (Chang)
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> index 444e517a8648..78a9c809dfad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,24 @@ void fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup(void)
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> -static void __fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd);
> +static void __guest_fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and
> +	 * sizes may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas
> +	 * user features and sizes remain the same.
> +	 */
> +	fpstate->size		= guest_default_cfg.size;
> +	fpstate->xfeatures	= guest_default_cfg.features;
> +	fpstate->user_size	= fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
> +	fpstate->user_xfeatures	= fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
> +	fpstate->xfd		= xfd;
> +
> +	/* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
> +	fpstate->is_valloc	= true;
> +	fpstate->is_guest	= true;
> +}
> +

Extra newline.
>  
>  static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(void)
>  {
> @@ -236,19 +253,18 @@ bool fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
>  	struct fpstate *fpstate;
>  	unsigned int size;
>  
> -	size = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size + ALIGN(offsetof(struct fpstate, regs), 64);
> +	size = guest_default_cfg.size + ALIGN(offsetof(struct fpstate, regs), 64);
> +
>  	fpstate = vzalloc(size);
>  	if (!fpstate)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* Leave xfd to 0 (the reset value defined by spec) */
> -	__fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
> +	__guest_fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);

Given that there is a single caller for each of __fpstate_reset() and
__guest_fpstate_reset(), keeping the helpers does more harm than good IMO.
Passing in '0' and setting xfd in __guest_fpstate_reset() is especially pointless.

E.g.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index d5f3af2ba758..87d6ee87ff55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -212,25 +212,6 @@ void fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup(void)
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
-static void __guest_fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
-{
-       /*
-        * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and
-        * sizes may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas
-        * user features and sizes remain the same.
-        */
-       fpstate->size           = guest_default_cfg.size;
-       fpstate->xfeatures      = guest_default_cfg.features;
-       fpstate->user_size      = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
-       fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
-       fpstate->xfd            = xfd;
-
-       /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
-       fpstate->is_valloc      = true;
-       fpstate->is_guest       = true;
-}
-
-
 static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(void)
 {
        struct fpu_state_perm *fpuperm;
@@ -260,8 +241,20 @@ bool fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
        if (!fpstate)
                return false;
 
-       /* Leave xfd to 0 (the reset value defined by spec) */
-       __guest_fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
+       /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
+       fpstate->is_valloc      = true;
+       fpstate->is_guest       = true;
+
+       /*
+        * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and sizes
+        * may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas user features
+        * and sizes are always identical the same.
+        */
+       fpstate->size           = guest_default_cfg.size;
+       fpstate->xfeatures      = guest_default_cfg.features;
+       fpstate->user_size      = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
+       fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
+
        fpstate_init_user(fpstate);
 
        gfpu->fpstate           = fpstate;
@@ -550,21 +543,17 @@ void fpstate_init_user(struct fpstate *fpstate)
                fpstate_init_fstate(fpstate);
 }
 
-static void __fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
-{
-       /* Initialize sizes and feature masks */
-       fpstate->size           = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size;
-       fpstate->user_size      = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
-       fpstate->xfeatures      = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
-       fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
-       fpstate->xfd            = xfd;
-}
-
 void fpstate_reset(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
        /* Set the fpstate pointer to the default fpstate */
        fpu->fpstate = &fpu->__fpstate;
-       __fpstate_reset(fpu->fpstate, init_fpstate.xfd);
+
+       /* Initialize sizes and feature masks */
+       fpu->fpstate->size              = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size;
+       fpu->fpstate->user_size         = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
+       fpu->fpstate->xfeatures         = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
+       fpu->fpstate->user_xfeatures    = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
+       fpu->fpstate->xfd               = init_fpstate.xfd;
 
        /* Initialize the permission related info in fpu */
        fpu->perm.__state_perm          = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-06 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06  9:36 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduce CET supervisor state support Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Always preserve non-user xfeatures/flags in __state_perm Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:51   ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] x86/fpu: Drop @perm from guest pseudo FPU container Chao Gao
2025-05-06 10:00   ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Differentiate default features for host and guest FPUs Chao Gao
2025-05-08 20:02   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest FPU permissions from guest defaults Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container " Chao Gao
2025-05-06 17:24   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-05-07  7:37     ` Chao Gao
2025-05-07 18:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-07 18:04         ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-09  8:14   ` [PATCH v6a 5/8] " Chao Gao
2025-05-09  8:16   ` [PATCH v6a 6/8] x86/fpu: Remove xfd argument from __fpstate_reset() Chao Gao
2025-05-09 18:29     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce "guest-only" supervisor xfeature set Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Add CET supervisor xfeature support as a guest-only feature Chao Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBpFvyITMc0WhlX4@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.