From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikhail Ulyanov <mikhail.ulyanov@cogentembedded.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] media: rcar_jpu: remove redundant case statement when c is zero
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 13:27:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aByHDZyu0pptFUlK@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508100835.336240-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The case statement where c is zero is redundant because the previous
> while loop will only exit if c is non-zero or non-0xff, so c can
> never be zero by the time the switch statement is reaced. Clean up
> the code by removing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar_jpu.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
612
613 for (;;) {
614 int c;
615
616 /* skip preceding filler bytes */
617 do
618 c = get_byte(&jpeg_buffer);
619 while (c == 0xff || c == 0);
Unrelated to your commit, but get_byte() returns -1 for out of
bounds. I wish there were a explicit check for that. We end
up hitting one of the "return 0;" statements depending on if
we've found a JPEG_MARKER_SOI.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 10:08 [PATCH][next] media: rcar_jpu: remove redundant case statement when c is zero Colin Ian King
2025-05-08 10:27 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aByHDZyu0pptFUlK@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mikhail.ulyanov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.