Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tpm/tpm_svsm: support TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC

[Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>]

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 09:13:34AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 22:02, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 06:06:50PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 03:45, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > > > From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This driver does not support interrupts, and receiving the response is
> > > > > synchronous with sending the command.
> > > > >
> > > > > Enable synchronous send() with TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC, which implies that
> > > > > ->send() already fills the provided buffer with a response, and ->recv()
> > > > > is not implemented.
> > > > >
> > > > > Keep using the same pre-allocated buffer to avoid having to allocate
> > > > > it for each command. We need the buffer to have the header required by
> > > > > the SVSM protocol and the command contiguous in memory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v5:
> > > > > - changed order and parameter names to match tpm_try_transmit() [Jarkko]
> > > > > v4:
> > > > > - reworked commit description [Jarkko]
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > >
> > > > I can pick this for 6.16.
> > >
> > > Great, thanks!
> >
> > Can you rebase this on top of my next branch and send one more version
> > of the series (fake ancestor crap)?
> 
> I tried, but the last patch (this one) is based on the series merged
> on the tip tree, where I introduced tpm_svsm.
> I can see that series in linux-next merged with commit
> 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07,
> but I can't see it in your next tree [1].
> 
> How do we proceed in such cases?
> 
> Just to be sure, did I use the right tree?

Thanks for the remark. Lemme check tonight. Hold on doing
anything ;-) We'll get there...

> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/?h=next
> 
> 

BR, Jarkko