From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 787D4280019 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 15:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747843119; cv=none; b=EhEw/qLtC4Uu47IVfj664VxzYSgj1ZSSGjsMOewExDe7Uz9nz51bwXtHqU1aGhoTFWB0KKZCZRFVpQa1Cti2SG+9/r4sopgonZXRVZwOdisVDANIX/ilkYlMVAkDCH2nzlpIuMtRc6fBe+s6KFD33EVT5tnHG9nHXpocSqLMjTI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747843119; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SbFSyj1iYbULqAsNnPRoOnLQK6wLPvxvnSYBvWw3chc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JnaI4S9yCiUeswoxQSnRXtkSLzFjYTJhQp8bix+p+ZgjqRAvRD5sW7E/P3rQ+mjeCuk3kUNhlO4tPJmnKqMuVxEQy5ht8Zecd4JQAoWiC/qCoMkpetUUNbaR8NveA6XXrwpvNXIjZaEAAMH/waOKOH7PqBJzdp67XPCNSLRcVRI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=ZUPKp/e0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=ZUPKp/e0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="ZUPKp/e0"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="ZUPKp/e0" Received: by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id F28E4606CA; Wed, 21 May 2025 17:58:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1747843115; bh=wTjKnDdoSGwycb/dFNUbzHbZLKjSFoeHcl89Onil37A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZUPKp/e0O7F16jmjzHl3Ar1Bu4EW/syC5V5QWMOSldTdI7K91RalcnXw4OVUikXsn Fun6VLph3nt4J6kMqjNtPmFFRWepJFKor3sY+YkcUquBvc8RiSsguiRnQ4L/3XgvGX CTwJdTpSNUqEDyaNDASOk8N/OMQF6BFchpazMMu7BZw+jJ7ppntql+jRoialyhcRm5 Sn3hEXedQC+memQFx3wW9pbYgtT2AXkeybKag/nmJjTd1ghLeLp3tGNrzb7jADF8it x88JknIaOr3E903Qs0EEfAOWMWeriHp9aQMPhfdJwba8/cihC4WjcN19jtZdyrgNHq L87osLRhyTwhA== X-Spam-Level: Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4674602EA; Wed, 21 May 2025 17:58:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1747843115; bh=wTjKnDdoSGwycb/dFNUbzHbZLKjSFoeHcl89Onil37A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZUPKp/e0O7F16jmjzHl3Ar1Bu4EW/syC5V5QWMOSldTdI7K91RalcnXw4OVUikXsn Fun6VLph3nt4J6kMqjNtPmFFRWepJFKor3sY+YkcUquBvc8RiSsguiRnQ4L/3XgvGX CTwJdTpSNUqEDyaNDASOk8N/OMQF6BFchpazMMu7BZw+jJ7ppntql+jRoialyhcRm5 Sn3hEXedQC+memQFx3wW9pbYgtT2AXkeybKag/nmJjTd1ghLeLp3tGNrzb7jADF8it x88JknIaOr3E903Qs0EEfAOWMWeriHp9aQMPhfdJwba8/cihC4WjcN19jtZdyrgNHq L87osLRhyTwhA== Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 17:58:31 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Jozsef Kadlecsik , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v1 0/3] netfilter: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking. Message-ID: References: <20250512102846.234111-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250512102846.234111-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:28:43PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I was looking at the build-time defined per-CPU variables in netfilter > and added the needed local-BH-locks in order to be able to remove the > current per-CPU lock in local_bh_disable() on PREMPT_RT. > NF wise nft_set_pipapo is missing but this requires some core changes so > I need to postspone it for now. > > This has been split out of the networking series which was sent earlier. > Therefore the last patch (nf_dup_netdev) will likely clash with net-next > due to changes in include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h (both add an entry). Applied to nf-next, thanks.