From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
jingoohan1@gmail.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
robh@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: dwc: Standardize link status check to return bool
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 10:00:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCL8Kcseye3okRCt@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250510160710.392122-2-18255117159@163.com>
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 12:07:08AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> Modify link_up functions across multiple DWC PCIe controllers to return
> bool instead of int. Simplify conditional checks by directly returning
> logical evaluations. This improves code clarity and aligns with PCIe
> status semantics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-10 16:07 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Standardize link status check to return bool Hans Zhang
2025-05-10 16:07 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: dwc: " Hans Zhang
2025-05-13 8:00 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-05-10 16:07 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: mobiveil: Refactor link status check Hans Zhang
2025-05-13 8:00 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-10 16:07 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: cadence: Simplify j721e " Hans Zhang
2025-05-13 8:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-13 9:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Standardize link status check to return bool Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-16 8:52 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-16 14:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-13 9:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-13 14:42 ` Hans Zhang
2025-05-13 10:21 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-05-13 13:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-13 14:57 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-05-13 14:47 ` Hans Zhang
2025-05-13 15:04 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-05-13 15:09 ` Hans Zhang
2025-05-13 15:41 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCL8Kcseye3okRCt@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.