From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] x86/boot: Set 5-level paging CPU cap before entering C code
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:37:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCRWSpS8B-B26AB6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXF0Kc+--5rOqcVKoF-NhYfzA2rioaWsB09VK1hJ49nG+w@mail.gmail.com>
* Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL) && (native_read_cr4() & X86_CR4_LA57))
> > > - setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_5LEVEL_PAGING);
>
> Note that at this point, we'll likely still have to force clear the
> original X86_FEATURE_LA57 bit, to address the issue that Kirill
> raised that user space is now likely to conflate the "la57" cpuinfo
> string with 5-level paging being in use.
No, I think the general outcome of your series is fine and clean in
terms of kernel-internal logic, and I wouldn't mess up that clarity
with user ABI quirks: and we can solve the /proc/cpuinfo ABI
compatibility requirement by exposing X86_FEATURE_5LEVEL_PAGING as
'la57', and renaming X86_FEATURE_LA57 to X86_FEATURE_LA57_HW and
exposing it as a (new) la57_hw flag, or so.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 11:11 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Robustify pgtable_l5_enabled() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] x86/boot: Defer initialization of VM space related global variables Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 8:15 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/cpu: Use a new feature flag for 5 level paging Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 19:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-14 7:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-14 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 8:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 8:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-14 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 8:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-14 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-13 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] x86/cpu: Allow caps to be set arbitrarily early Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 18:37 ` Brian Gerst
2025-05-14 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 9:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-21 13:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] x86/boot: Set 5-level paging CPU cap before entering C code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 8:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 8:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-05-14 8:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] x86/boot: Drop the early variant of pgtable_l5_enabled() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] x86/boot: Drop 5-level paging related variables and early updates Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCRWSpS8B-B26AB6@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.