All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next,v1 0/6] revisiting nf_tables ruleset validation
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 08:03:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCWDoXLJCYIy14oF@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514214216.828862-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso (6):
>   netfilter: nf_tables: honor EINTR in ruleset validation from commit/abort path

Do this via nf.git?

>   netfilter: nf_tables: honor validation state in preparation phase
>   netfilter: nf_tables: add infrastructure for chain validation on updates
>   netfilter: nf_tables: add new binding infrastructure
>   netfilter: nf_tables: use new binding infrastructure
>   netfilter: nf_tables: add support for validating incremental ruleset updates
> 
>  include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h |  52 +-
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c     | 800 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c     |  25 +-
>  3 files changed, 844 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

This is a lot of new code but no explanation as to why is given.

Does this fix bugs with the existing scheme?

Or is this an optimization? If so, how big is the speedup?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 21:42 [PATCH nf-next,v1 0/6] revisiting nf_tables ruleset validation Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-14 21:42 ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 1/6] netfilter: nf_tables: honor EINTR in ruleset validation from commit/abort path Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-15  9:56   ` Phil Sutter
2025-05-14 21:42 ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 2/6] netfilter: nf_tables: honor validation state in preparation phase Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-14 21:42 ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 3/6] netfilter: nf_tables: add infrastructure for chain validation on updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-14 21:42 ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 4/6] netfilter: nf_tables: add new binding infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-15 12:32   ` Phil Sutter
2025-05-14 21:42 ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 5/6] netfilter: nf_tables: use " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-15 12:34   ` Phil Sutter
2025-05-14 21:42 ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 6/6] netfilter: nf_tables: add support for validating incremental ruleset updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-15 12:05   ` Phil Sutter
2025-05-15  6:03 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-05-19 15:10   ` [PATCH nf-next,v1 0/6] revisiting nf_tables ruleset validation Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-20 10:42     ` Florian Westphal
2025-05-20 11:29       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCWDoXLJCYIy14oF@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.