From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127A414B092; Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747325806; cv=none; b=XxD6YTL+JDJprffxBVSDJw3UYWLNefStjfjeTJt7tczdTHfRxAKKDbTLhWzihttj53CsmOa8yhs8csFFsGzy0utFwO9Qd5mMpLQrX9C5FcXsVxG18oAajBv7qFY3byhsxXEvrrWSByyVOZSCrBbS/ADqHwQvbG8ayFV5TU0D1Z0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747325806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+Z/FBhF3TsVxxcYnzna6c2Ltc2O0dK+361Hx/d/etQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=L+MSZe/28wKNwDx2k1MXYNcD+yL81d92Y4BSo1zB8+T+Oqw1nAGiXfo1xtuwJ1juAS2aV1fQlJPAlHWJZRts+rTJlGuV01VZgw86q5ZBvH+L5dWiVGKkS5MXpfka/aG2GZbzFQUAlBiVWL9k8jphc/DbAXUOih40OnqYXbUu7Hw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R0Nf2s9O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R0Nf2s9O" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29179C4CEE7; Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747325805; bh=+Z/FBhF3TsVxxcYnzna6c2Ltc2O0dK+361Hx/d/etQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R0Nf2s9OkbFqRBivLRaezHm0atUtMR5zpHlRTvBULTapnKj03u1HWv8P96nuURfgN u9q9Aoe19zv9sp6blgZTszp8ajLxE6DXJD8NXwS4gx1VgWWTX9zvx7oTwI+CJ60bax AWT4WrYgEx2QiAUurNU1WCb5Pp8fhlWt7RrPdDoij/lxkm6SvR3/lFINgu/idadpAp 3/Q0fuQras4f6WvSTXcdoKJWP9VFrJKhLugtnFJux06uICdYp4IHPIsKwKQ2OK3jlp xvAKTUREHiBNH/yawFXak0D0asihLHQR2EJTRW/oG2c8wHaJSwXNuhdEEXE+MUx5SY 1cf9GuQAZRVkA== Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:16:42 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Kan Liang , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Ravi Bangoria , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumaks for sub-NUMA clusters on graniterapids Message-ID: References: <20250515043818.236807-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 01:15:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:38:18PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On graniterapids the cache home agent (CHA) and memory controller > > (IMC) PMUs all have their cpumask set to per-socket information. In > > order for per NUMA node aggregation to work correctly the PMUs cpumask > > needs to be set to CPUs for the relevant sub-NUMA grouping. > > I'm blindly applying it as I can't test these changes, and I think this > is bad. In the end the only review/action I could do was to turn: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumaks for sub-NUMA clusters Into: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumasks for sub-NUMA clusters :-( Besides the build tests, etc. - Arnaldo