From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5EE282E1; Fri, 16 May 2025 08:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747385432; cv=none; b=U6c5Ve03Yg4pxSc7Nu6TFFCfHI1tR2a0NDC5ulxBep1LLP4YYs3sCRuPd6z3AgSQVO7QHuHHPJSiAATIeEJDyoj4o37akjckmjvDM3afyNCcOztPgPhi/QmGIBP27JorT7L7jnyQ6XNsTZkPLK0gMB9ljW+X8pZytSfnJ4lkFOk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747385432; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YeMsR+Q8rbkJfYosMP6R9lHZR953mBK5ZvA3rGosN7I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PaA3ngtgIetN7bbTGuIlBtYXIJnZgSeOZJ61NfzCW+EmRINKHRdz6LzGqFpfFMBcb8X2DJZeS9TpV1xdtERVp8sgKfO+trQ2PwwwZ1EndiChBRcQyQ9QWUDwz1pTfdOz+kwjGIKUYYtYf7NQ2zcB0yiMx9is6yni1VKdnyjaJ6o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ao426/So; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ao426/So" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7955C4CEE4; Fri, 16 May 2025 08:50:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747385430; bh=YeMsR+Q8rbkJfYosMP6R9lHZR953mBK5ZvA3rGosN7I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ao426/SotdeUutGnvr/v48OsPGYvwSjLfgXsOybB/VFmgil1AAb6jof8LQwHVP6El EPjC6oNhe7ShZvIc6hADRfYqWv7F4Gp76D5uSvQuS5JmV9PRk7t9T7dZwt0fU6yDwY ckW2HxDSAc0/oDNBx/HVbISiu/pbCOh5HdfLrQvi73dwAUSSNcC9OHFPdkmvBDWwHT CCm0incPf5VJegM80R29kJEaeRa+dp0XFBrCsIQpKhkkmlX5AzxuEZGhIxxi8jvxox fQuzdVYoBgVqcNtuJxesICnX6Hn5a2hqYMF3s/EOv3OaoXfSVS+5IAeyi9NlPzAawE Hd+iMq9S/LSug== Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 10:50:25 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , "H. Peter Anvin" , John Ogness , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cpuid: Fix CPUID(0x2) iterator kernel-doc Message-ID: References: <20250515202143.34448-1-darwi@linutronix.de> <20250515202143.34448-2-darwi@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250515202143.34448-2-darwi@linutronix.de> * Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > The CPUID(0x2) cache/TLB descriptors iterator has been recently changed > from: > > for_each_leaf_0x2_entry(regs, __ptr, entry) > > to: > > for_each_cpuid_0x2_desc(_regs, _ptr, _desc) > > but the attached kernel-doc was not fully adapted. Fix it. > > Fixes: c4c9ea879c3b ("x86/cpuid: Rename cpuid_get_leaf_0x2_regs() to cpuid_leaf_0x2()") > Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish I've folded this fix back into the originator commit. Thanks, Ingo