From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8D621ADC6; Fri, 16 May 2025 07:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747382081; cv=none; b=rlyIIXUjVWBlWoHCYmRMIQiuipbCZNinhDDwrTD9cEwsxJ2i3IwcckU7Mc75HgxjYLcM9eEdKFg27/JaCdojAs6l6+VE+jjRCRe7Mv8XlWXWYHSWU3pE7KwrsfSTFyGwtxMM+WJBFPqZ4T+YHhnaeu8GUWCCWl4V2U+JggTOsJA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747382081; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YSfKbVIwu+plTobu2WYKYnvMg3HxLlYHFzSqEGbrl5U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OLz/RVmAOtjQzxV6ANjzVJRVvg5/ggz2c1DLuSPQhuHYevccPz9ajeMxuXa9ANry1zbI5JZZ3OgN4nD9ko+rgWTzmbx/aDqLPCf1kWOBrSDcxDoRQmKIXlmRhy/bhXbJ3RpooPRgR059Fd0AsitBnKOdNTtnV/CBjkRNJO6RPFY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fCGEQZ3R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fCGEQZ3R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2907AC4CEE4; Fri, 16 May 2025 07:54:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747382080; bh=YSfKbVIwu+plTobu2WYKYnvMg3HxLlYHFzSqEGbrl5U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fCGEQZ3R4xBnG/qpktNbb559KyutB+p2jB0QbMZCILVVHQlEwItbEwy/6xXdebMfH r/eZJ/QFNrUs3YjEXbZBmnOv8mi7vfs7RsPbIcOdCpakJWxztEE2TBM/UMxpI+ejBm JPh2KY7HXIiXZPOE69bcj8VN2oS5i61m27OL+EOXHoaUxAXSQ9WDtKapebOiIBv29T bdVo12fLIPXme7Tc9iy+UEdE0Zb5+CcznELOq23v6tdTUsZZ9sbsRi6o1/+PMb1EFl iIw+OwkydtpPtlMobipbcwUBmXjuumIafJ/hqxDV6Huzf2B4i02hs8GyMiwX/6IokS neW62ogPVTjyQ== Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:54:35 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Artem Bityutskiy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree Message-ID: References: <20250516161541.0cff29b8@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250516161541.0cff29b8@canb.auug.org.au> * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > > between commit: > > 6138f3451516 ("intel_idle: Add C1 demotion on/off sysfs knob") > > from the pm tree and commit: > > 968e30006807 ("x86/cpuid: Set as the main CPUID header") > > from the tip tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > index 3292bf74e3c2,433d858b7be1..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c > @@@ -52,8 -51,7 +52,8 @@@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > - #include > + #include > #include > #include > #include So I don't think the change is needed - the header still fully exists: starship:~/tip> ls -lh arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h -rw-rw-r-- 1 mingo mingo 6.1K May 16 09:34 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h -rw-rw-r-- 1 mingo mingo 149 May 16 09:34 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h And the addition is probably a build fix for the PM tree? The header's indirect header dependencies did not change. Should probably not be carried in -next, as this masks a build failure that will then trigger in Linus's tree? (Unless I'm missing something that is.) Thanks, Ingo