From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 13:10:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCcPHwjaWxhHr4Nh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0ef6ae9348f46bcc135f0e6cb7663d763e40b72.1747376551.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:19:53AM -0500, Donet Tom wrote:
> register_one_node() is now only called via cpu_up() → __try_online_node()
> during CPU hotplug operations to online a node. At this stage, the node has
> not yet had any memory added. As a result, there are no memory blocks to
> walk or register, so calling register_memory_blocks_under_node() is
> unnecessary. Therefore, the call to register_memory_blocks_under_node()
> has been removed from register_one_node().
>
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> v3->v4
>
> Addressed Mike's comment by dropping the call to
> register_memory_blocks_under_node() from register_one_node()
>
> v3 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/b49ed289096643ff5b5fbedcf1d1c1be42845a74.1746250339.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
> v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe1e0c7d91bf3fa9a64ff5d84b53ded1d0d5ac7.1745852397.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
> v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/50142a29010463f436dc5c4feb540e5de3bb09df.1744175097.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
> ---
> include/linux/node.h | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
> index 806e62638cbe..8b8f96ca5b06 100644
> --- a/include/linux/node.h
> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
> @@ -137,15 +137,9 @@ static inline int register_one_node(int nid)
> int error = 0;
>
> if (node_online(nid)) {
> - struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> - unsigned long start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
> - unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
> -
> error = __register_one_node(nid);
> if (error)
> return error;
> - register_memory_blocks_under_node(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn,
> - MEMINIT_EARLY);
> }
>
> return error;
> --
> 2.43.5
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 8:19 [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time Donet Tom
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] driver/base: remove register_mem_block_under_node_early() Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node Donet Tom
2025-05-16 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:58 ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-05-20 10:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drivers/base : Rename register_memory_blocks_under_node() and remove context argument Donet Tom
2025-05-16 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:07 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-16 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 11:00 ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 11:00 ` Donet Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCcPHwjaWxhHr4Nh@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.