From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, walling@linux.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, jrossi@linux.ibm.com,
fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/25] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 09:16:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCw6XJj9oOY_np_D@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508225042.313672-10-zycai@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:50:25PM -0400, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
> From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>
> DIAG 508 subcode 1 performs signature-verification on signed components.
> A signed component may be a Linux kernel image, or any other signed
> binary. **Verification of initrd is not supported.**
>
> The instruction call expects two item-pairs: an address of a device
> component, an address of the analogous signature file (in PKCS#7 format),
> and their respective lengths. All of this data should be encapsulated
> within a Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock, with the CertificateStoreInfo
> fields ignored. The DIAG handler will read from the provided addresses
> to retrieve the necessary data, parse the signature file, then
> perform the signature-verification. Because there is no way to
> correlate a specific certificate to a component, each certificate
> in the store is tried until either verification succeeds, or all
> certs have been exhausted.
>
> The subcode value is denoted by setting the second-to-left-most bit of
> a 2-byte field.
>
> A return code of 1 indicates success, and the index and length of the
> corresponding certificate will be set in the CertificateStoreInfo
> portion of the SigVerifBlock. The following values indicate failure:
>
> 0x0202: component data is invalid
> 0x0302: signature is not in PKCS#7 format
> 0x0402: signature-verification failed
>
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> crypto/x509-utils.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/crypto/x509-utils.h | 4 ++
> include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag508.h | 22 +++++++++
> target/s390x/diag.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/x509-utils.c b/crypto/x509-utils.c
> index 51bd75d4eb..56d9a42f39 100644
> --- a/crypto/x509-utils.c
> +++ b/crypto/x509-utils.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <gnutls/gnutls.h>
> #include <gnutls/crypto.h>
> #include <gnutls/x509.h>
> +#include <gnutls/pkcs7.h>
>
> static const int qcrypto_to_gnutls_hash_alg_map[QCRYPTO_HASH_ALGO__MAX] = {
> [QCRYPTO_HASH_ALGO_MD5] = GNUTLS_DIG_MD5,
> @@ -373,6 +374,51 @@ cleanup:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int qcrypto_verify_x509_cert(uint8_t *cert, size_t cert_size,
> + uint8_t *comp, size_t comp_size,
> + uint8_t *sig, size_t sig_size, Error **errp)
> +{
> + int rc = -1;
> + gnutls_x509_crt_t crt;
> + gnutls_pkcs7_t signature;
> + gnutls_datum_t cert_datum = {.data = cert, .size = cert_size};
> + gnutls_datum_t data_datum = {.data = comp, .size = comp_size};
> + gnutls_datum_t sig_datum = {.data = sig, .size = sig_size};
> + gnutls_x509_crt_fmt_t fmt;
> +
> + fmt = qcrypto_get_x509_cert_fmt(cert, cert_size, errp);
> + if (fmt == -1) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Certificate is neither in DER or PEM format");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (gnutls_x509_crt_init(&crt) < 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to initialize certificate");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (gnutls_x509_crt_import(crt, &cert_datum, fmt) != 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to import certificate");
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (gnutls_pkcs7_init(&signature) < 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to initalize pkcs7 data.");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (gnutls_pkcs7_import(signature, &sig_datum , fmt) != 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to import signature");
> + }
> +
> + rc = gnutls_pkcs7_verify_direct(signature, crt, 0, &data_datum, 0);
> +
> +cleanup:
> + gnutls_x509_crt_deinit(crt);
> + gnutls_pkcs7_deinit(signature);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> #else /* ! CONFIG_GNUTLS */
>
> int qcrypto_check_x509_cert_fmt(uint8_t *cert, size_t size,
> @@ -438,4 +484,12 @@ int qcrypto_get_x509_cert_key_id(uint8_t *cert, size_t size,
> return -ENOTSUP;
> }
>
> +int qcrypto_verify_x509_cert(uint8_t *cert, size_t cert_size,
> + uint8_t *comp, size_t comp_size,
> + uint8_t *sig, size_t sig_size, Error **errp)
> +{
> + error_setg(errp, "signature-verification support requires GNUTLS");
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* ! CONFIG_GNUTLS */
> diff --git a/include/crypto/x509-utils.h b/include/crypto/x509-utils.h
> index cf43de0b2c..ec90667376 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/x509-utils.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/x509-utils.h
> @@ -35,4 +35,8 @@ int qcrypto_get_x509_cert_key_id(uint8_t *cert, size_t size,
> size_t *resultlen,
> Error **errp);
>
> +int qcrypto_verify_x509_cert(uint8_t *cert, size_t cert_size,
> + uint8_t *comp, size_t comp_size,
> + uint8_t *sig, size_t sig_size, Error **errp);
> +
Needs API docs to say what all these different params mean
> #endif
Please always aim to seperate out code from different subsystems into
separate patches, if technically possible.
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag508.h b/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag508.h
> index 6281ad8299..80a5bb906b 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag508.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag508.h
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index 954c95fe50..2171e3275d 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -494,7 +494,10 @@ void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>
> void handle_diag_508(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> {
> + S390IPLCertificateStore *qcs = s390_ipl_get_certificate_store();
> + size_t csi_size = sizeof(Diag508CertificateStoreInfo);
> uint64_t subcode = env->regs[r3];
> + uint64_t addr = env->regs[r1];
> int rc;
>
> if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
> @@ -509,7 +512,83 @@ void handle_diag_508(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>
> switch (subcode) {
> case DIAG_508_SUBC_QUERY_SUBC:
> - rc = 0;
> + rc = DIAG_508_SUBC_SIG_VERIF;
> + break;
> + case DIAG_508_SUBC_SIG_VERIF:
> + size_t svb_size = sizeof(Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock);
> + Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock *svb;
> + uint64_t comp_len, comp_addr;
> + uint64_t sig_len, sig_addr;
> + uint8_t *svb_comp;
> + uint8_t *svb_sig;
> + int verified;
> + Error *err = NULL;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!qcs || !qcs->count) {
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_NO_CERTS;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!diag_parm_addr_valid(addr, svb_size, false) ||
> + !diag_parm_addr_valid(addr, csi_size, true)) {
> + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ra);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + svb = g_new0(Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock, 1);
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, svb, svb_size);
> +
> + comp_len = be64_to_cpu(svb->comp_len);
> + comp_addr = be64_to_cpu(svb->comp_addr);
> + sig_len = be64_to_cpu(svb->sig_len);
> + sig_addr = be64_to_cpu(svb->sig_addr);
> +
> + if (!comp_len || !comp_addr) {
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_INVAL_COMP_DATA;
> + g_free(svb);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!sig_len || !sig_addr) {
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_INVAL_PKCS7_SIG;
> + g_free(svb);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + svb_comp = g_malloc0(comp_len);
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(comp_addr, svb_comp, comp_len);
> +
> + svb_sig = g_malloc0(sig_len);
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(sig_addr, svb_sig, sig_len);
> +
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_FAIL_VERIF;
> + /*
> + * It is uncertain which certificate contains
> + * the analogous key to verify the signed data
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < qcs->count; i++) {
> + verified = qcrypto_verify_x509_cert((uint8_t *)qcs->certs[i].raw,
> + qcs->certs[i].size,
> + svb_comp, comp_len,
> + svb_sig, sig_len, &err);
> +
> + /* return early if GNUTLS is not enabled */
> + if (verified == -ENOTSUP) {
> + g_free(svb);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (verified == 0) {
> + svb->csi.idx = i;
> + svb->csi.len = cpu_to_be64(qcs->certs[i].size);
> + cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, &svb->csi, be32_to_cpu(csi_size));
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_OK;
Leaks 'svb' here
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + g_free(svb);
This and all the other paths leak 'svb_comp' and
'svb_sig'.
Declare all three allocated vars with 'g_autofree' and then you don't
need to remember to manually g_free them.
> break;
> default:
> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 22:50 [PATCH v2 00/25] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] Add -boot-certificates to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-13 14:58 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] hw/s390x/ipl: Create certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-14 5:43 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-29 18:49 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-14 9:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-29 17:51 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] s390x: Guest support for Certificate Store Facility (CS) Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-14 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for certificate store facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-14 8:17 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-14 15:32 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-14 16:18 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-29 19:09 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-30 6:38 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-20 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-20 8:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-20 9:24 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] hw/s390x/ipl: Set iplb->len to maximum length of " Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-20 9:29 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-20 9:39 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-20 10:25 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-29 19:28 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-26 14:46 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] Add -secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-21 12:14 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 21/25] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-21 12:20 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-08 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] docs/system/s390x: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2025-05-21 12:37 ` Thomas Huth
2025-05-23 20:28 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCw6XJj9oOY_np_D@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.