From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
To: Roland Clobus <rclobus@rclobus.nl>,
Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: 1106070@bugs.debian.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [6.12.y regression] loosetup: failed to set up loop device: Invalid argument after 184b147b9f7f ("loop: Add sanity check for read/write_iter")
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 08:10:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCwcvC4KBu6j4Dqz@eldamar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCwZy6leWNvr7EMd@eldamar.lan>
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 07:57:31AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> In Debian Roland Clobus reported a regression with setting up loop
> devices from a backing squashfs file lying on read-only mounted target
> directory from a iso.
>
> The original report is at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/1106070
>
> Quoting the report:
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:15:10PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-6.12.29-amd64
> > Version: 6.12.29-1
> > Severity: important
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
> > User: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: amd64
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: phil@hands.com
> > User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: openqa
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot
> >
> > Hello maintainers of the kernel,
> >
> > The new kernel (6.12.29) has a modified behaviour (compared to 6.12.27) for
> > the loop device.
> >
> > This causes the Debian live images (for sid) to fail to boot.
> >
> > The change happened between 20250518T201633Z and 20250519T021902Z, which
> > matches the upload of 6.12.29 (https://tracker.debian.org/news/1646619/accepted-linux-signed-amd64-612291-source-into-unstable/)
> > at 20250518T230426Z.
> >
> > To reproduce:
> > * Download the daily live image from https://openqa.debian.net/tests/396941/asset/iso/smallest-build_sid_20250519T021902Z.iso
> > * Boot into the live image (the first boot option)
> > * Result: an initramfs shell (instead of a live system) -> FAIL
> > * Try: `losetup -r /dev/loop1 /run/live/medium/live/filesystem.squashfs`
> > * Result: `failed to set up loop device: invalid argument` -> FAIL
> > * Try: `cp /run/live/medium/live/filesystem.squashfs /`
> > * Try: `losetup -r /dev/loop2 /filesystem.squashfs`
> > * Result: `loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 1460312` -> PASS
> >
> > It appears that the loopback device cannot be used any more with the mount
> > /run/live/medium (which is on /dev/sr0).
> >
> > I've verified: the md5sum of the squashfs file is OK.
> >
> > The newer kernel is not in trixie yet.
> >
> > With kind regards,
> > Roland Clobus
>
> A short reproducer is as follows:
>
> iso="netinst.iso"
> url="https://openqa.debian.net/tests/396941/asset/iso/smallest-build_sid_20250519T021902Z.iso"
> if [ ! -e "${iso}" ]; then
> wget "${url}" -O "${iso}"
> fi
> mountdir="$(mktemp -d)"
> mount -v "./${iso}" "${mountdir}"
> losetup -v -r -f "${mountdir}/live/filesystem.squashfs"
> loosetup -l
>
> resulting in:
>
> mount: /tmp/tmp.HgbNe7ek3h: WARNING: source write-protected, mounted read-only.
> mount: /dev/loop0 mounted on /tmp/tmp.HgbNe7ek3h.
> losetup: /tmp/tmp.HgbNe7ek3h/live/filesystem.squashfs: failed to set up loop device: Invalid argument
> NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE DIO LOG-SEC
> /dev/loop0 0 0 1 0 /root/netinst.iso 0 512
>
> Reverting 184b147b9f7f ("loop: Add sanity check for read/write_iter")
> on top of 6.12.29 fixes the issue:
>
> mount: /tmp/tmp.ACkkdCdYvB: WARNING: source write-protected, mounted read-only.
> mount: /dev/loop0 mounted on /tmp/tmp.ACkkdCdYvB.
> NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE DIO LOG-SEC
> /dev/loop1 0 0 0 1 /tmp/tmp.ACkkdCdYvB/live/filesystem.squashfs 0 512
> /dev/loop0 0 0 1 0 /root/netinst.iso 0 512
>
> For completeness, netinst.iso is a iso9660 fstype with mount options
> "ro,relatime,nojoliet,check=s,map=n,blocksize=2048,iocharset=utf8".
>
> #regzbot introduced: 184b147b9f7f
> #regzbot link: https://bugs.debian.org/1106070
Just tested: The regression exists as well in 6.15-rc7 so it is not
specific to the stable 6.12.y update.
Regards,
Salvatore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3a333f27-6810-4313-8910-485df652e897@rclobus.nl>
2025-05-20 5:57 ` [6.12.y regression] loosetup: failed to set up loop device: Invalid argument after 184b147b9f7f ("loop: Add sanity check for read/write_iter") Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-05-20 6:10 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso [this message]
2025-05-20 6:34 ` Christian Hesse
2025-05-20 7:16 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-05-20 15:23 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCwcvC4KBu6j4Dqz@eldamar.lan \
--to=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=1106070@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.xu@windriver.com \
--cc=rclobus@rclobus.nl \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.