From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627EC242D85 for ; Tue, 20 May 2025 14:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747750140; cv=none; b=b4dqeXoPYHVKsDwEni5dk3i+iZ/EwfHlcOmMMkjYJ2o1L0pdCbXIRCq5HRibaRXxImHV7emHdSLvjHzyAJnzpoa3tKek2r+mwofBu+qry2OIzcFOI9Dj79hKcvnsTg5DL0dJIPW8A9y4SXO7Vnay/h35slI3J5gKX4Bzfr0AwPI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747750140; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dzrcAoSATR5IqT7A/EbJNdOLgUgJ9CEnV8VyLzDdmY8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=BJErzNL5MmtolyqZV9+opqcw1ZCyHAG4yB/9PKQZQ+Q/2lcUn3FRRFI17QIX3raOM7A5NmlGDyMuFJ0gmQ+7NpXNP8+/XG3coCuouHVvU2IYIHz1WwmDqcEBVDbNLJ99ya3txsDiUp4XCxhMNWPACvJocgzQyjL75nBesgv7oHo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=bmj4azBl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="bmj4azBl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=atcbji7K8wVrrwGlTh94zn6jWdvwg2eM1Y3aBgSsH7o=; b=bmj4azBl3ryGQIcXNXUMnKpzI5 DZsE0KQrYEU4+XdMglQdphpCe94U0+jvw+2G2GYvzOQj77kFmBkqqyAq/On4jcg//GG/2jNKvaUq2 poK9dajNJMFsEMceOhvxtiaEErfttHY9GeKd86TlFHZn9LFTpvNuqwD+27/mJ/yc0iSdxk5fapElP BmaEOH8Ds5Z4yrgJPxj70Zf8pwKNf6X+Fjjn3+AtdMBdNEkMBGqYEZm+pJyaU5W+LuCdt2/j2ieck Vcv0BHV4jF5xjFUPR46gydLfY1Z9nXNq+1FODPXSXEIgaKmPqSgIkRrXklvMb+11e/ZejzjAqjrCR oe6F3r9w==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHNeN-0000000D6zp-05Lr; Tue, 20 May 2025 14:08:59 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 07:08:58 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Subject: xfs/566 execution time Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Hi Darrick, we regularly see execution times of more than half a day for xfs/566 on a 30ish TB SMR HDD. Do you think there might be a useful way to scale down the load on rotational devices?