From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC700C54E71 for ; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:15:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+Kq4vyvCOzwMXjMugvDzDXWKbOHVjshLZaUXVLhkgyg=; b=Y/74ztxbk3WDCtM0v6T9b1vOYZ LwtweX1EYjN0jXhG/fSJNDPhbpnz5C8NAV+UT2Xko1hxLwpSM5ezKi6URpt5AbHZDxCz7f8tAnKnD 3jn0IzZ9Sq/pXrhtGk2Kty6yF99w8CMibhD2Z/08aKsUT/6CB/bVmzSjETpjDihH1iJx1bSktpcS+ oSxIKKzstpI79aT2F1aOI16LynzntEPCYCcNSdkPT8RhFDJTMcrz+xDeF1yGUSa8ocCgdLNbLOp/U 5m171MJV5shgaTf+SKjzcbkaqUiwZfwK7qQZBVYbzOErEcR54lzhJIZP5tS5XgPadbEEEms9k7Gam EWc4al3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHTMn-0000000E3rP-36R0; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:15:13 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHTAr-0000000E24D-1fgF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:02:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE6B44275; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C612C4CEE9; Tue, 20 May 2025 20:02:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747771373; bh=ipb1eCljeIm2r5OkPhtSsa9n7gXb96lo1YYOTFP6ZPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dLhb1sSFzls6z4ybonOCIe75fqv5xXE/hup5qinNdeuHoGd8MuPuOzlXXBO9wl/8f Hh/5LQiTqGwYS7l+HT2NlPKflmOHvkwjZ0E0l5Od8hav8x2u5jTo3wpcu7ms4/xc8Y rrirDQSHOhDouqRY0ThHP5RPBaQ99RqtIViakrmmw02J0NkyR08Sqgl9x/m34+E38W ZtLIDsqOJnIEBm9GODFUfpIF0vIBoM6iZNmT7UjcN56ul0EMvOWaMJMq97TVUMWCgO 0AQBNZE275z5UeHLQoyyLzjlXlZvZnkzB+CbngW8H3F5wxFd4Ym1OcUtaqnMUqD9nA ZQO3bRsWqj1Uw== Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 23:02:49 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Huewe , Jens Wiklander , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , Nicholas Piggin , Sumit Garg , James Bottomley , Claudiu Beznea , Madhavan Srinivasan , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christophe Leroy , Naveen N Rao , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tpm/tpm_svsm: support TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC Message-ID: References: <20250514134630.137621-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <20250514134630.137621-5-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250520_130253_481910_7DE8B6AD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 35.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 06:06:50PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 03:45, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella > > > > > > This driver does not support interrupts, and receiving the response is > > > synchronous with sending the command. > > > > > > Enable synchronous send() with TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC, which implies that > > > ->send() already fills the provided buffer with a response, and ->recv() > > > is not implemented. > > > > > > Keep using the same pre-allocated buffer to avoid having to allocate > > > it for each command. We need the buffer to have the header required by > > > the SVSM protocol and the command contiguous in memory. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella > > > --- > > > v5: > > > - changed order and parameter names to match tpm_try_transmit() [Jarkko] > > > v4: > > > - reworked commit description [Jarkko] > > > --- > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c | 27 +++++++++++---------------- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c > > > index 0847cbf450b4..f5ba0f64850b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c > > > @@ -26,37 +26,31 @@ struct tpm_svsm_priv { > > > }; > > > > > > static int tpm_svsm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, > > > - size_t len) > > > + size_t cmd_len) > > > { > > > struct tpm_svsm_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); > > > int ret; > > > > > > - ret = svsm_vtpm_cmd_request_fill(priv->buffer, 0, buf, len); > > > + ret = svsm_vtpm_cmd_request_fill(priv->buffer, 0, buf, cmd_len); > > > if (ret) > > > return ret; > > > > > > /* > > > * The SVSM call uses the same buffer for the command and for the > > > - * response, so after this call, the buffer will contain the response > > > - * that can be used by .recv() op. > > > + * response, so after this call, the buffer will contain the response. > > > + * > > > + * Note: we have to use an internal buffer because the device in SVSM > > > + * expects the svsm_vtpm header + data to be physically contiguous. > > > */ > > > - return snp_svsm_vtpm_send_command(priv->buffer); > > > -} > > > - > > > -static int tpm_svsm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) > > > -{ > > > - struct tpm_svsm_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); > > > + ret = snp_svsm_vtpm_send_command(priv->buffer); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > > > > - /* > > > - * The internal buffer contains the response after we send the command > > > - * to SVSM. > > > - */ > > > - return svsm_vtpm_cmd_response_parse(priv->buffer, buf, len); > > > + return svsm_vtpm_cmd_response_parse(priv->buffer, buf, bufsiz); > > > } > > > > > > static struct tpm_class_ops tpm_chip_ops = { > > > .flags = TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP, > > > - .recv = tpm_svsm_recv, > > > .send = tpm_svsm_send, > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -85,6 +79,7 @@ static int __init tpm_svsm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > > > dev_set_drvdata(&chip->dev, priv); > > > > > > + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC; > > > err = tpm2_probe(chip); > > > if (err) > > > return err; > > > -- > > > 2.49.0 > > > > > > > > > > I can pick this for 6.16. > > Great, thanks! Can you rebase this on top of my next branch and send one more version of the series (fake ancestor crap)? > > Stefano > BR, Jarkko