All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lai, Yi" <yi1.lai@linux.intel.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	yi1.lai@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf/core: Use POLLHUP for a pinned event in error
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:10:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aD2w50VDvGIH95Pf@ly-workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317061745.1777584-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

Hi Namhyung Kim,

Greetings!

I used Syzkaller and found that there is WARNING: locking bug in perf_event_wakeup in linux-next next-20250530.

After bisection and the first bad commit is:
"
f4b07fd62d4d perf/core: Use POLLHUP for pinned events in error
"

All detailed into can be found at:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup
Syzkaller repro code:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/repro.c
Syzkaller repro syscall steps:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/repro.prog
Syzkaller report:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/repro.report
Kconfig(make olddefconfig):
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/kconfig_origin
Bisect info:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/bisect_info.log
bzImage:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/raw/refs/heads/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/bzImage_next-20250530
Issue dmesg:
https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/blob/main/250601_162355_perf_event_wakeup/next-20250530_dmesg.log

"
[   39.913691] =============================
[   39.914157] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   39.914623] 6.15.0-next-20250530-next-2025053 #1 Not tainted
[   39.915271] -----------------------------
[   39.915731] repro/837 is trying to lock:
[   39.916191] ffff88801acfabd8 (&event->waitq){....}-{3:3}, at: __wake_up+0x26/0x60
[   39.917182] other info that might help us debug this:
[   39.917761] context-{5:5}
[   39.918079] 4 locks held by repro/837:
[   39.918530]  #0: ffffffff8725cd00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __perf_event_task_sched_in+0xd1/0xbc0
[   39.919612]  #1: ffff88806ca3c6f8 (&cpuctx_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x1a7/0xbc0
[   39.920748]  #2: ffff88800d91fc18 (&ctx->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x1f9/0xbc0
[   39.921819]  #3: ffffffff8725cd00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: perf_event_wakeup+0x6c/0x470
[   39.922823] stack backtrace:
[   39.923171] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 837 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.15.0-next-20250530-next-2025053 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[   39.923196] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.o4
[   39.923214] Call Trace:
[   39.923221]  <TASK>
[   39.923228]  dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150
[   39.923256]  dump_stack+0x19/0x20
[   39.923276]  __lock_acquire+0xb22/0x22a0
[   39.923308]  ? x86_pmu_commit_txn+0x195/0x2b0
[   39.923339]  ? __lock_acquire+0x412/0x22a0
[   39.923375]  lock_acquire+0x170/0x310
[   39.923407]  ? __wake_up+0x26/0x60
[   39.923448]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0x80
[   39.923473]  ? __wake_up+0x26/0x60
[   39.923504]  __wake_up+0x26/0x60
[   39.923537]  perf_event_wakeup+0x14a/0x470
[   39.923571]  merge_sched_in+0x846/0x15c0
[   39.923610]  visit_groups_merge.constprop.0.isra.0+0x952/0x1420
[   39.923653]  ? __pfx_visit_groups_merge.constprop.0.isra.0+0x10/0x10
[   39.923688]  ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x12/0x20
[   39.923724]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30
[   39.923766]  ctx_sched_in+0x471/0xa20
[   39.923804]  ? __pfx_ctx_sched_in+0x10/0x10
[   39.923838]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20
[   39.923878]  perf_event_sched_in+0x47/0xa0
[   39.923912]  __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x3fc/0xbc0
[   39.923951]  ? __pfx___perf_event_task_sched_in+0x10/0x10
[   39.923984]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30
[   39.924012]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp8+0x1c/0x30
[   39.924046]  ? xfd_validate_state+0x14f/0x1b0
[   39.924081]  finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x525/0x990
[   39.924117]  ? lock_unpin_lock+0xdc/0x170
[   39.924152]  __schedule+0xef3/0x3840
[   39.924185]  ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10
[   39.924218]  ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xad/0xf0
[   39.924259]  schedule+0xf6/0x3d0
[   39.924285]  exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x7a/0x110
[   39.924315]  do_syscall_64+0x284/0x2e0
[   39.924340]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[   39.924360] RIP: 0033:0x7ff14103ee5d
[   39.924381] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 8
[   39.924400] RSP: 002b:00007fffb2745578 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038
[   39.924418] RAX: 0000000000000346 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007ff14103ee5d
[   39.924431] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000082000
[   39.924443] RBP: 00007fffb27455c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[   39.924456] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fffb27459a8
[   39.924468] R13: 0000000000404e78 R14: 0000000000406e08 R15: 00007ff141389000
[   39.924497]  </TASK>
[   40.307815] coredump: 804(repro): over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump
[   40.472093] coredump: 795(repro): over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump
[   40.545575] coredump: 799(repro): over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump
[   40.948915] coredump: 833(repro): over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump
[   40.989336] coredump: 811(repro): over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump
[   42.121469] coredump: 857(repro): over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump
"

Hope this cound be insightful to you.

Regards,
Yi Lai

---

If you don't need the following environment to reproduce the problem or if you
already have one reproduced environment, please ignore the following information.

How to reproduce:
git clone https://gitlab.com/xupengfe/repro_vm_env.git
cd repro_vm_env
tar -xvf repro_vm_env.tar.gz
cd repro_vm_env; ./start3.sh  // it needs qemu-system-x86_64 and I used v7.1.0
  // start3.sh will load bzImage_2241ab53cbb5cdb08a6b2d4688feb13971058f65 v6.2-rc5 kernel
  // You could change the bzImage_xxx as you want
  // Maybe you need to remove line "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,readonly=on,file=./OVMF_CODE.fd \" for different qemu version
You could use below command to log in, there is no password for root.
ssh -p 10023 root@localhost

After login vm(virtual machine) successfully, you could transfer reproduced
binary to the vm by below way, and reproduce the problem in vm:
gcc -pthread -o repro repro.c
scp -P 10023 repro root@localhost:/root/

Get the bzImage for target kernel:
Please use target kconfig and copy it to kernel_src/.config
make olddefconfig
make -jx bzImage           //x should equal or less than cpu num your pc has

Fill the bzImage file into above start3.sh to load the target kernel in vm.


Tips:
If you already have qemu-system-x86_64, please ignore below info.
If you want to install qemu v7.1.0 version:
git clone https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git
cd qemu
git checkout -f v7.1.0
mkdir build
cd build
yum install -y ninja-build.x86_64
yum -y install libslirp-devel.x86_64
../configure --target-list=x86_64-softmmu --enable-kvm --enable-vnc --enable-gtk --enable-sdl --enable-usb-redir --enable-slirp
make
make install 

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 11:17:45PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Pinned events can go to an error state when they are failed to be
> scheduled in the context.  And they won't generate samples anymore
> and silently ignored until it's recovered by PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE or
> something (and of course the condition also should be changed so that
> they can be scheduled in).  But then users should know about the state
> change.
> 
> Currently there's no mechanism to notify users when they go to an error
> state.
> 
> One way to do this is to issue POLLHUP event to poll(2) to handle this.
> Reading events in an error state would return 0 (EOF) and it matches to
> the behavior of POLLHUP according to the man page.
> 
> Users should remove the fd of the event from pollfd after getting
> POLLHUP, otherwise it'll be returned repeatedly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 2533fc32d890eacd..cef1f5c60f642d21 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -3984,6 +3984,11 @@ static int merge_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
>  		if (event->attr.pinned) {
>  			perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
>  			perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR);
> +
> +			if (*perf_event_fasync(event))
> +				event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP;
> +
> +			perf_event_wakeup(event);
>  		} else {
>  			struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(event->pmu_ctx->pmu);
>  
> @@ -5925,6 +5930,10 @@ static __poll_t perf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>  	if (is_event_hup(event))
>  		return events;
>  
> +	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(event->state) == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR &&
> +		     event->attr.pinned))
> +		return events;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Pin the event->rb by taking event->mmap_mutex; otherwise
>  	 * perf_event_set_output() can swizzle our rb and make us miss wakeups.
> -- 
> 2.49.0.rc1.451.g8f38331e32-goog
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-02 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17  6:17 [RFC/PATCH] perf/core: Use POLLHUP for a pinned event in error Namhyung Kim
2025-03-17  7:47 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Use POLLHUP for pinned events " tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
2025-06-02 14:10 ` Lai, Yi [this message]
2025-06-02 17:32   ` [RFC/PATCH] perf/core: Use POLLHUP for a pinned event " Namhyung Kim
2025-06-03  1:48     ` Lai, Yi
2025-06-03  4:49       ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aD2w50VDvGIH95Pf@ly-workstation \
    --to=yi1.lai@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.