From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD410C5AD49 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 16:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1004652.1384369 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uMU6Y-0005lI-AJ; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:10 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1004652.1384369; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uMU6Y-0005lB-5o; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:10 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1004652; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:09 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uMU6X-0005l5-5A for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:09 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uMU6W-000Gzj-2l; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:08 +0000 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1da:8420:b77:bd5:6e45:7633] (helo=l14) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uMU6W-006EQw-2w; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:03:08 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=pisaKtL3MIeruJOLIMwS+fjY5pQV6SvYfczT5BZv9i8=; b=qUQwvCiWihEVxjQOYDCpgN3kRI zMaBoDVZ59AqRrKRPhwqMTD3gn5FRWQK4oyrxu6WRMy3eea42GN3gbtxXpJl/8tfINq943XOm24VD 4l/phc+FKJlwM9A9qI5W+5cZlsJb0vgiHDipfYBzfNVSBn+2vljVQhZpskGo68RezwQw=; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:03:06 +0200 From: Anthony PERARD To: Andrew Cooper Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marczykowski-G=F3recki?= , Anthony PERARD , Doug Goldstein , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH 6/9] CI: Upload junit result as artefact Message-ID: References: <20250603124222.52057-1-anthony@xenproject.org> <20250603124222.52057-7-anthony@xenproject.org> <30007ef7-9576-41fb-8d4d-08ae7cbdacc4@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <30007ef7-9576-41fb-8d4d-08ae7cbdacc4@citrix.com> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:13:59PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 03/06/2025 1:42 pm, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > From: Anthony PERARD > > > > This allow to investigate the file in cases of error. Not all > > jobs that extend ".adl-x86-64" are creating a "tests-junit.xml" but > > Gitlab only produce a warning when the file isn't found. > > I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. I guess I can shorten the message to (with some rewording): "This allows to investigate the junit file in cases of parse error." I guess it doesn't matter if a gitlab job is expected to produce "tests-junit.xml" or not. Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD