From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.secunet.com (mx1.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5018C189919 for ; Fri, 23 May 2025 10:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747996569; cv=none; b=r0zMtd6Hg7LTM7Q4vXQsauqKIbNJvUfe8u1zFy68st9aY8hJVjg7/Nl38Ymjpn1sZKnHgJhGJI4pTwjkAQEdO+2oBC5L+0DAg5McPDyieoNSQEh1MoCUWN7KlFsxoIYKy7AJUYvbccZ02ySybvVfmf8ZM7iv3C8IUvnCzBOiJpM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747996569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8LABh7d/XgbnWK7z2l+q+6ShePWtn6lWb7kmZicD2z4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pBLvyKSaHhli6HO4qoFiGs+59HUt6BgRgw/DtRxlwKHM0V1g1bHtPEL0lDdgjhigXl7X1jsRJkWLcr7rtMZymY5jyBLw6hf5ZfXoSP2smvc85/1+NBpB38fHVOVDp6hemDOPPzdbZXHUHT5LaAcBSi/7ts9PGt4KCQh6X6pn7bE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E1F208A2; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from mx1.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ksjesTj4NRZ; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCH-02.secunet.de (unknown [10.32.0.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B83BA2082E; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.secunet.com B83BA2082E Received: from mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) by EXCH-02.secunet.de (10.32.0.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.2.1748.10; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:03 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:03 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC7B131818E9; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:02 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: David Miller , Jakub Kicinski CC: Herbert Xu , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2025-05-23 Message-ID: References: <20250523075611.3723340-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250523075611.3723340-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 09:55:59AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > 1) Remove some unnecessary strscpy_pad() size arguments. > From Thorsten Blum. > > 2) Correct use of xso.real_dev on bonding offloads. > Patchset from Cosmin Ratiu. > > 3) Add hardware offload configuration to XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE. > From Chiachang Wang. > > 4) Refactor migration setup during cloning. This was > done after the clone was created. Now it is done > in the cloning function itself. > From Chiachang Wang. > > 5) Validate assignment of maximal possible SEQ number. > Prevent from setting to the maximum sequrnce number > as this would cause for traffic drop. > From Leon Romanovsky. > > 6) Prevent configuration of interface index when offload > is used. Hardware can't handle this case.i > From Leon Romanovsky. > > 7) Always use kfree_sensitive() for SA secret zeroization. > From Zilin Guan. > > Please pull or let me know if there are problems. > > Thanks! I forgot to mention a merge conflict between fd5ef5203ce6 ("ixgbe: wrap netdev_priv() usage") from the net-next tree and commit: 43eca05b6a3b ("xfrm: Add explicit dev to .xdo_dev_state_{add,delete,free}") from the ipsec-next tree. It can be solved as done in linux-next. Thanks!