From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3976BC54ED1 for ; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.998451.1379172 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uJuZ9-00087p-64; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:03 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 998451.1379172; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uJuZ9-00087i-3K; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:03 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 998451; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:02 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uJuZ8-00087c-3q for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:02 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uJuZ7-0053Lp-2i; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:01 +0000 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1da:8420:b77:bd5:6e45:7633] (helo=l14) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uJuZ8-00A3a2-03; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:42:01 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=3jcIE3AZCA5b2l0xa8fnUJSl81DISlLs88JjwIVQqD4=; b=JzjaTRy3XVZFa/+5Nin9bS0M70 yJfktD/zdDy3LDFJ/RcTKTGWGUKdUwx1eaAo+4ntJ9HQHoR9pLtmuiK609w5HTncEllX6uFToZFSk NNa+8CPDVlVc3CzP5eLyF79U+4PG4LlBI2ukS5snsKeyzILetLDPhD8I5eUxiv6v+vBQ=; Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 15:41:59 +0200 From: Anthony PERARD To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini , Michal Orzel , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marczykowski-G=F3recki?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CI/qubes: Deduplicate the handling of ${dom0_check} Message-ID: References: <20250522173640.575452-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <20250522173640.575452-2-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250522173640.575452-2-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Make it clear that ${dom0_check} is unconditional. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD