All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: don't lose folio dropbehind state for overwrites
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 09:52:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDZQIETrdC_4fKGU@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5153f6e8-274d-4546-bf55-30a5018e0d03@kernel.dk>

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 05:01:31PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> DONTCACHE I/O must have the completion punted to a workqueue, just like
> what is done for unwritten extents, as the completion needs task context
> to perform the invalidation of the folio(s). However, if writeback is
> started off filemap_fdatawrite_range() off generic_sync() and it's an
> overwrite, then the DONTCACHE marking gets lost as iomap_add_to_ioend()
> don't look at the folio being added and no further state is passed down
> to help it know that this is a dropbehind/DONTCACHE write.
> 
> Check if the folio being added is marked as dropbehind, and set
> IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE if that is the case. Then XFS can factor this into
> the decision making of completion context in xfs_submit_ioend().
> Additionally include this ioend flag in the NOMERGE flags, to avoid
> mixing it with unrelated IO.
> 
> Since this is the 3rd flag that will cause XFS to punt the completion to
> a workqueue, add a helper so that each one of them can get appropriately
> commented.
> 
> This fixes extra page cache being instantiated when the write performed
> is an overwrite, rather than newly instantiated blocks.
> 
> Fixes: b2cd5ae693a3 ("iomap: make buffered writes work with RWF_DONTCACHE")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-27 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-27 23:01 [PATCH v2] iomap: don't lose folio dropbehind state for overwrites Jens Axboe
2025-05-27 23:52 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2025-05-28  8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-29 10:28 ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aDZQIETrdC_4fKGU@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.